Friday, January 25, 2013

Monday, Jan 28 blogging unit

YOU NEED YOUR EAR BUDS!

New ASSIGNMENT: Blogging There is a lot of information. Please take the time and read.

Blogging emerged in the late 1990s, coinciding with the advent of web publishing tools that facilitated the posting of content by non-technical users.Blogs are usually the work of a single individual, occasionally of a small group, and often are themed on a single subject. (Blog can also be used as a verb, meaning to maintain or add content to a blog.)

Although not a must, most good quality blogs are interactive, allowing visitors to leave comments and even message each other on the blogs; it is this interactivity that distinguishes them from other static websites. In that sense, blogging can be seen as a form of social networking. Indeed, bloggers do not only produce content to post on their blogs but also build social relations with their readers and other bloggers.

MECHANICS

This unit will consist of responding to three discussion points. What this will entail is that every couple of days, you will listen or read a  prompt to which you will respond. These responses should be subjective, much as one would write an editorial; however, they should not be diatribes, but insightful, reflective observations. At the same time, again like an editorial, there will be some controversy. Not everyone will have the same reaction. Your intitial response should be a minimum of 200 words. You should make reference to particular statements you have heard or read, make comments, pose questions and bring up tangential information. All responses are on the blog for everyone to read. Lead off your response with (blank says). These must be posted by midnight that day, in order for you to get credit. (You will easily be able to complete these in class.) The following day, you will scan the many observations, choose two and respond to them in a minimum of 100 words. Again both must be posted by midnight for credit. Note, you may comment on anyone's blog from any journalism class.

1. Read or listen to  the article.
2. Respond and post your postion / obsevation / reflection. (You might want to check your information.) Your initial response should be no fewer than 200 words. While the tone may be more conversational, you should adhere to correct standards of grammar, punctuation and spelling. This gives much more credence to what you say. As well, it will be noted in the grading.
3. Now read some of your classmates' responses and respond to at least two of these in a minumum of 100 words each.  Make sure to identify yourself and to whom you are addressing. ( ie. dmpalond in response to Michael) Again, these are not attacks, but thoughtful reflections and observations. Also, you may want to do a little background reading to support your position.

4. Grading: For each article- and the two responses of a minimum of 100 words- you will potentially receive 95 points. New articles will be posted every other day. Make sure that you have identified yourself clearly on the blog, so that you receive the appropriate credit. As this is on line, you won't have any difficulties completing this whether or not you are in class.

5. Last item: as there are between 73 and 146 responses everyday that I must check, NO LATE WORK WILL BE ACCEPTED. As well, it is imperative that you identify yourself clearly, so that you receive credit for your work.
Day 1: For your first blog, please listen to the following TED talk given by James Hansen, who heads the NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies in New York City, a part of the Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Maryland. He has held this position since 1981. He is also an adjunct professor in the Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences at Columbia University.

Note that there is a transcript, if you do not have your ear buds or need to check specifics from the talk. When you watch the following, note ideas on journalism, war and community and more.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k2hQL9Zrokk

transcipt 
This is how war starts. One day you're living your ordinary life, you're planning to go to a party, you're taking your children to school, you're making a dentist appointment. The next thing, the telephones go out, the TVs go out, there's armed men on the street, there's roadblocks. Your life as you know it goes into suspended animation. It stops.
I'm going to steal a story from a friend of mine, a Bosnian friend, about what happened to her, because I think it will illustrate for you exactly what it feels like. She was walking to work one day in April, 1992, in a miniskirt and high heels. She worked in a bank. She was a young mother. She was someone who liked to party. Great person. And suddenly she sees a tank ambling down the main road of Sarajevo knocking everything out of its path. She thinks she's dreaming, but she's not. And she runs as any of us would have done and takes cover, and she hides behind a trash bin, in her high heels and her miniskirt. And as she's hiding there, she's feeling ridiculous, but she's seeing this tank go by with soldiers and people all over the place and chaos and she thinks, "I feel like Alice in Wonderland going down the rabbit hole, down, down, down into chaos, and my life will never be the same again."
A few weeks later, my friend was in a crowd of people pushing with her infant son in her arms to give him to a stranger on a bus, which was one of the last buses leaving Sarajevo to take children out so they could be safe. And she remembers struggling with her mother to the front, crowds and crowds of people, "Take my child! Take my child!" and passing her son to someone through a window. And she didn't see him for years. The siege went on for three and a half years, and it was a siege without water, without power, without electricity, without heat, without food, in the middle of Europe, in the middle of the 20th century.
I had the honor of being one of those reporters that lived through that siege, and I say I have the honor and the privilege of being there because it's taught me everything, not just about being a reporter, but about being a human being. I learned about compassion. I learned about ordinary people who could be heroes. I learned about sharing. I learned about camaraderie. Most of all, I learned about love. Even in the midst of terrible destruction and death and chaos, I learned how ordinary people could help their neighbors, share food, raise their children, drag someone who's being sniped at from the middle of the road even though you yourself were endangering your life, helping people get into taxis who were injured to try to take them to hospitals.
I learned so much about myself. Martha Gellhorn, who's one of my heroes, once said, "You can only love one war. The rest is responsibility." I went on to cover many, many, many wars after that, so many that I lost count, but there was nothing like Sarajevo.
Last April, I went back to a very strange -- what I called a deranged high school reunion. What it was, was the 20th anniversary of the siege, the beginning of the siege of Sarajevo, and I don't like the word "anniversary," because it sounds like a party, and this was not a party. It was a very somber gathering of the reporters that worked there during the war, humanitarian aid workers, and of course the brave and courageous people of Sarajevo themselves. And the thing that struck me the most, that broke my heart, was walking down the main street of Sarajevo, where my friend Aida saw the tank coming 20 years ago, and in that road were more than 12,000 red chairs, empty, and every single one of them symbolized a person who had died during the siege, just in Sarajevo, not in all of Bosnia, and it stretched from one end of the city to a large part of it, and the saddest for me were the tiny little chairs for the children.
I now cover Syria, and I started reporting it because I believed that it needs to be done. I believe a story there has to be told. I see, again, a template of the war in Bosnia. And when I first arrived in Damascus, I saw this strange moment where people didn't seem to believe that war was going to descend, and it was exactly the same in Bosnia and nearly every other country I've seen where war comes. People don't want to believe it's coming, so they don't leave, they don't leave before they can. They don't get their money out. They stay because you want to stay in your home. And then war and chaos descend.
Rwanda is a place that haunts me a lot. In 1994, I briefly left Sarajevo to go report the genocide in Rwanda. Between April and August, 1994, one million people were slaughtered. Now if those 12,000 chairs freaked me out with the sheer number, I want you just for a second to think of a million people. And to give you some example, I remember standing and looking down a road as far as I could see, at least a mile, and there were bodies piled twice my height of the dead. And that was just a small percentage of the dead. And there were mothers holding their children who had been caught in their last death throes.
So we learn a lot from war, and I mention Rwanda because it is one place, like South Africa, where nearly 20 years on, there is healing. Fifty-six percent of the parliamentarians are women, which is fantastic, and there's also within the national constitution now, you're actually not allowed to say Hutu or Tutsi. You're not allowed to identify anyone by ethnicity, which is, of course, what started the slaughter in the first place. And an aid worker friend of mine told me the most beautiful story, or I find it beautiful. There was a group of children, mixed Hutus and Tutsis, and a group of women who were adopting them, and they lined up and one was just given to the next. There was no kind of compensation for, you're a Tutsi, you're a Hutu, you might have killed my mother, you might have killed my father. They were just brought together in this kind of reconciliation, and I find this remarkable. So when people ask me how I continue to cover war, and why I continue to do it, this is why.
When I go back to Syria, next week in fact, what I see is incredibly heroic people, some of them fighting for democracy, for things we take for granted every single day. And that's pretty much why I do it.
In 2004, I had a little baby boy, and I call him my miracle child, because after seeing so much death and destruction and chaos and darkness in my life, this ray of hope was born. And I called him Luca, which means "The bringer of light," because he does bring light to my life. But I'm talking about him because when he was four months old, my foreign editor forced me to go back to Baghdad where I had been reporting all throughout the Saddam regime and during the fall of Baghdad and afterwards, and I remember getting on the plane in tears, crying to be separated from my son, and while I was there, a quite famous Iraqi politician who was a friend of mine said to me, "What are you doing here? Why aren't you home with Luca?" And I said, "Well, I have to see." It was 2004 which was the beginning of the incredibly bloody time in Iraq, "I have to see, I have to see what is happening here. I have to report it." And he said, "Go home, because if you miss his first tooth, if you miss his first step, you'll never forgive yourself. But there will always be another war."
And there, sadly, will always be wars. And I am deluding myself if I think, as a journalist, as a reporter, as a writer, what I do can stop them. I can't. I'm not Kofi Annan. He can't stop a war. He tried to negotiate Syria and couldn't do it. I'm not a U.N. conflict resolution person. I'm not even a humanitarian aid doctor, and I can't tell you the times of how helpless I've felt to have people dying in front of me, and I couldn't save them. All I am is a witness. My role is to bring a voice to people who are voiceless. A colleague of mine described it as to shine a light in the darkest corners of the world. And that's what I try to do. I'm not always successful, and sometimes it's incredibly frustrating, because you feel like you're writing into a void, or you feel like no one cares. Who cares about Syria? Who cares about Bosnia? Who cares about the Congo, the Ivory Coast, Liberia, Sierra Leone, all of these strings of places that I will remember for the rest of my life? But my métier is to bear witness and that is the crux, the heart of the matter, for us reporters who do this. And all I can really do is hope, not to policymakers or politicians, because as much as I'd like to have faith that they read my words and do something, I don't delude myself.
But what I do hope is that if you remember anything I said or any of my stories tomorrow morning over breakfast, if you can remember the story of Sarajevo, or the story of Rwanda, then I've done my job.
Thank you very much.

172 comments:

  1. On the surface, most individuals would just find this video to be some random woman ranting about foreign affairs and wars. However, such individuals must look over their naivety and realize that she just wants us, the listeners, to absorb at least a small amount of what she was saying. I will admit that at first I didn’t particularly care for the video, and found the speaker to be a bit pretentious in her speaking. But if you truly listen with an open mind you’ll realize that she simply wants to raise awareness among the world and let us know that while we take our simple and easy lives for granted, there are still genocides, wars and crimes against mankind all over the world. I believe she wanted us to just take away this one statement, “But what I do hope is that if you remember anything I said or any of my stories tomorrow morning over breakfast, if you can remember the story of Sarajevo, or the story of Rwanda, then I've done my job.” I personally won’t lose any sleep over what I have hear in this video, but I understand what she is doing and have a profound respect for it.

    -Joe

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Joe,

      While i agree with some of the points you made, i found that some of your thoughts are all over the place. For example, you seem to have a strong understanding and supporting position of the speaker / video at the being of your post, but towards the end you seem to almost flip to a different point of view saying, " I personally won’t lose any sleep over what I have hear in this video". This makes you seem like a sort of hypocrite and i personally don't care for it sir.

      -Swag Master 69

      Delete
    2. Swag Master,

      Who the hell do you think you are?!

      -Joe

      Delete
    3. I agree with Joe completely. While the speaker's topic is very relevant and respectable, I found myself immediately turned off of what she was saying because of her delivery. The tone she had while remembering the story was sort of airy and self involved. It seemed like she wanted us to think "Wow, this woman is so down to earth and experienced. She's so wise." While she was talking about her friend, she spent much more time talking about herself. While I won't go so far as to say that don't I find her genuine, I feel like there's a hidden motive behind her recant of the events. I get the impression she likes the attention, and that devalues her entire talk.

      Delete
    4. Swag Master,

      You watch your damn mouth!

      -Malikk

      Delete
    5. I agree with Joe and Malikk. I also get the impression that she likes the attention. Her tone of voice was kind of melancholy. It seemed like sometimes she wanted the audience to get into her state of depression or sadness, but it didn't really work because the tone of her voice. But just as Joe said I do believe and understand that all she wanted was for her readers was to raise awareness about the situation and just has have her readers and others involved to what is actually going on in other parts of the world.

      Delete
  2. Malikk Truitt
    Ms. Parker
    Video Response
    28 January 2013

    This video is depressing on several levels. The first and most obvious is that 12,000 people dying is sad. Those people had entire futures, lives they’d affect, or possibly even create, and all that potential was destroyed. The second thing that’s depressing is that this is a low number. The amount of people that have died because of war related things like sieges eclipses 12,000. As far as the world’s history is concerned that’s nothing. Perhaps the most depressing is that this isn’t shocking to me. 12,000 deaths should horrify me and haunt my thoughts, but it doesn’t. I’ve been conditioned to sympathize and move on. If I’m honest with myself, I know I consider my own miniscule problems more relevant. By the time I finish this response and move into the next period of my day, I know that I’ll have put the entire talk out of my mind. The brutal world we live in has largely desensitized me to things like the massacre of a people. In part its because I’m thankful it didn’t happen to me or anyone I know, and part of it is because my happiness is much more important to me than the loss of lives that don’t affect me.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Jordan Polcyn-Evans responding to Malikk
      The talk really made me think about how there's barely anything I can do to stop things like what she described. I share your feelings about being used to all of these terrible stories and events. After reading your comment, I can't stop trying to wrap my head around the idea of 12,000 people dying. I just can't imagine it, especially compared to a million people. 12,000 people dying in a foreign country and what's being done? That's like 4 times as much as 9/11.

      What even is life

      Delete
    2. Wars and massacres taking more than 12000 lives should be horrifying but when I've become so used to hearing about 20 lives taken by a suicide bomber in Iraq or 15 trampled to death while running from police in Syria every day for years, it desensitizes. I totally agree with that that the most depressing part of it all is that it's not shocking anymore. After thinking about it, I can try to sympathize on as many levels as I can but I don't think any of us will ever know what it's like and truly connect with it until we go through it ourselves. I hope that it doesn't come to that.

      Delete
    3. Zachary Jaeckel-Rizzo Responding to Malikk
      The talk she gave also felt very underwhelming, the way she presented it, but I was definitely taken aback by the imagery of the 12,000 chairs. It’s true that we can be unaffected when we here about relatively small death counts, but a total this high shouldn’t go unnoticed, where as it seems to do so anyway. And it can make you fell very weak, and I did feel sad that we couldn’t help this tragedy from happening, or at least help.

      Delete
    4. The pure honesty of Malikk's response sets his aside from anyone elses. Unlike Malikk, the overwhelming majority of responses, including my own, either discredit Janine di Giovanni's tone and delivery or make an effort to conform to a universal humanitarian stereotype. The truth is, in the course of the day, no matter how "heartfelt" your response was, no matter how genuine, in the course of a week this event will simply be seen as an assignment in the mass pool of the High School grading system. It terrifies me that a death tool of 12,000 hardly phases the average American Citizen as it is seen on paper, even the Giovanni's allusion to the mile long stack of bodies, twice her height, eventually just becomes a topic of High School discussion. Discussion in which students conveniently decide to verbally attack Janine di Giovanni's tone or delivery, rather than focusing on the true meaning of the speech.

      Delete
    5. I think that Malik’s response was really good. I like the fact that he added his personal opinion but he supported why he felt that way with the evidence that was presented in the TED video. I can agree with him when he said that 12,000 people losing their lives is a troubling and sad fact, even more so because the reason behind their lost life is a pointless war. I can also agree with the fact that it’s no longer troubling to the people in any society when such a massacre like 12,000 lives are lost. They just pick up the pieces and continue on with life as usual.

      Delete
    6. I agree with Malikk response, innocent people died for a reason that is intolerable those people didn’t deserve it. in addition yes the amount of people that died is very heartrending but after finishing this assignment I feel that most of us didn’t feel mournful anymore because it didn’t happen to us personally but don’t get me wrong I do feel bad about all the death that happens just not as much as if it were to impact me directly. The woman in the video reports on things like this all the time and I time she can do this because t has happen to her though she does feel sympathy for her friend which I would too but it doesn’t really affect ourself till its us.

      Delete
  3. Zachary Jaeckel-Rizzo

    Janine di Giovanni is a reporter who has been put into many situations that people wouldn’t want to report on, but in addition to this she takes a reporters stand point and stays professional, but in this talk she takes a less professional stand point in this talk and speaks on her own growth from reporting on these wars. “I had the honor of being one of those reporters who lived through the siege, and I say I have the honor and the privilege of being there because it has taught me everything, not just about being a reporter, but being a human being.” This is what Janine di Giovanni says about her work as a reporter for the siege of Sariavo. She then moves on to talking about her work reporting on Syria, and how people don’t want to believe that a war is coming, so they don’t prepare and leave. What surprised me was quickly she talked about Syria and jumped to a talk about Rwanda and how she was shocked about seeing millions of Rwandans dead. After this she goes back to putting her own self into the story and how she had to remove herself from her son to report on Bagdad, and literally crying because she left her son while she left her son, but while she was there, a famous Iraqi diplomat asked her why she was there, and why she wasn’t home with her son, and that there will always be another war, and how her reporting on wars can not help that, and how helpless it is to just be a witness. She ends by admitting how useless reporting can feel “and how it can feel like you are writing into a void…but as long as someone can remember…I have done my job.”

    ReplyDelete
  4. Olivia Wood
    Blog Post Response

    Reporter Janine di Giovanni puts herself in some of the world’s most dangerous situations in order to “bring light to the darkest corners of the world”. She speaks of her war stories and experiences, as nothing but a witness to the events that have occurred in warzones like Bosnia, Rwanda, Syria, and Baghdad. When Giovanni first began to speak, it was clear that she had a distinctly humanistic approach with her ideas about war. She spoke not of politics, but of people. She spoke of the commoners, and the abrupt change in lifestyle that occurs when a country goes to war. In the beginning, I have to admit, I found myself wondering where this was all going. Towards the end; her purpose became clear. She concludes by stating, “All I am is a witness. My role is to bring a voice to people who are voiceless.” I believe Giovanni aimed to share both the tragic and beautiful events she was a witness to, while simultaneously defining her career as a Journalist and the role of Journalists as humanitarians in the midst of impulsive, politically driven societies.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I found that her humanistic approach was almost too humanistic. There is more to be understood about war than just suffering. I experienced a similar confusion in the beginning as to what her "point" was, and admittedly, even after watching it I may have read a different message. After reading your comment, I am compelled to think differently about what her purpose was in sharing these stories. I appreciate her attempts to make more people understand the suffering of others. I appreciate it maybe more than I did when I wrote my response, which is seeming to me now to be increasingly callous....

      Delete
    2. I realize that your response posted here illustrates a shift in opinion, but I am curious about where you based your original opinions. You said that "there is more to be understood about war than just suffering." I was also put off by her manner of speaking, but I think it's safe to assume that she understands far more about war than either of us can imagine. Do you believe she is missing the point and not fully educated about the topic of her speech? If so, what do you believe she has yet to understand about war?

      Delete
    3. I agree with Olivia. At the beginning of the video I found myself asking what is the point of all this as well. But it did become very clear towards the end what the point was. Although Janine di Giovanni's video wasn't totally "emotional" to grab the audience attention it did have an aspect that displayed her "humanistic" approach as Olivia put it to somehow get the audience to connect with her experiences.

      Delete
  5. Terrille Howard


    After watching Janine di Giovanni’s video I wasn’t immediately emotionally compelled speech/lecture. For me her tone was extremely blend which caused me to lose interest in her topic. However, there were some moments when I did go “awe that’s so sad” or “damn”. One of those moments occurred when she mentioned, that one day she seen dead bodies stacked on one another for at least a mile and that the pile was taller than her. I can not even imagine let alone even want to attempt to imagine seeing something like that; it is to graphic for the human mind. Although, I wasn’t instantly compelled to her story, towards the conclusion of her speech/lecture I began to cogitate about society. How is it possible that things like that can even happen, how can other nations not intervene, how much strength and will power an individual must have to even survive an event like that. Another that stood out for me, was when she said her friend was walking to work and that she seen a tank just demolishing everything in sight and that her friend had to retrieve for safety and hid behind a garbage can. I thought that was crazy and scary.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I disagree with Terille. I don't think her tone was blend. Though its tough, if you listen closely you won't really hear any whirring. Throughout the entire video I watched and no ingredients were poured into her, therefore they couldn't be pulverized and mixed together. I could not note any breaking down into liquid form. In addition, her tone was constant. There was no variance or combination of other tones to create a delicious fruit tone. In my HUMBLE opinion her tone was not "extremely blend" as Terrille says. In fact, it wasn't even just regular blend. It would be more accurate to say it was solid, and the same throughout. There's a word for her tone. The word is BLAND.

      Delete
    2. @ Malikk: Way to be an asshole.

      @Terille: I agree with you when you mention how incredible (in a bad way) some of the violence is in war. It is crazy how many horrible things happen on a daily basis. I also agree with you when you noted how strong people need to be to get through these times. I can't imagine having to live in a war zone, having to watch all the terror around. One thing I disagree with you on however is the involvement of other parties. Regardless of who is fighting and how brutal one side is to another, there are still people fighting and dying either way. Intervention of other nations doesn't really solve anything.

      Hannah Z

      Delete
  6. Christine says:
    The emotion while she speaks was remarkable. It was heartfelt and emotional. She talked about her experience as a journalist and what things she witness while in Africa during their war. She expressed the times she wanted to help the people and seeing people die right in front of her face; not being able to do nothing. Being a journalist has opened her up to war and the sadness of a war. Wishing that as she writes or specks about what she say would had helped. One thing that she said was that in life there will always be a war it’s just how we handle it. She talked about her friends experience and how she had to give up her kid to be safe. To imagine giving you child to a complete stranger, never knowing if you’ll see them again. While she did her speech you could hear the emotion in the tone of her voice. It saddens her that these events happened. War is all over the world, journalist capture the picture of the events that are or did happen in those places.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. i agree it is true that she did speak with a passion that you only know through experience. when she spoke about her friend having to give her child the strangers in order to save them touched me like all i could think about was if i was in the same situation, all the feelings and thoughts going through my head, it must have been so very had for her.its a shame that wars happen and it is true what she said that wars will continue to happen but we learn from them.

      Delete
  7. Ty Adams

    This speech is very obnoxious to say the least. At some points I felt for her, and I actually felt her pain, but other parts I felt as though I was simply listening to a sob story. At the beginning of the video I had the attitude that, “Well, everyone goes through something so I can’t really sit here and feel bad for you,” but then I realized something. The speech wasn’t meant for any of us to feel sorry for her. The speech was a way of reminding us how much we take for granted, and how good we have certain things. I really honestly respect her publicly telling her story, but at the same time she can’t expect everyone to connect with her on that level, because some of us have already grown up witnessing horrible things, and negative things seemed to always be broadcasted on the news rather than positive, so this was honestly nothing new. However like I said I respect her for her poised demeanor and genuine attitude throughout her whole speech, and I do feel that this should remind us all how precious our lives are, and how good some of us have it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Jordan Polcyn-Evans responding to TY
      I agree with your view on the video. There really wasn't any shock value to it, which doesn't necessarily make it bad. It just made it seem a little more detached. I wouldn't exactly call her speech obnoxious though. I just think it could have been a lot more than it actually was.

      Delete
    2. I have the same respect for Janine as Ty does. I don't think Janine expects her listeners to connect her, who has physically witnessed these sieges, but to bring awareness to the war issue. For example when she says, "My role is to bring a voice to people who are voiceless." Yes there are other occurrences in the world that should be brought to light. But I think Janine's goal is to help her listeners realize the importance of life and not take advantage of their privileges.

      Jessica vongxay

      Delete
    3. Zachary Jaeckel-Rizzo Responding to TY
      I felt the same way watching this her voice felt very monotone, with the only exception being a slight change when she talked about her own experiences, but I didn't really feel anything except for when she talked about the 12,000 chairs, and because of this, connecting and listening to her talk was really difficult, even though she had some good things to say.

      Delete
    4. Nobody wants to talk about death for eleven minutes, i don't see how her tone could have changed anything... After all, it's about death. It's meant to raise awareness not captivate the teenage population. I feel as if you have to really have an open mind when listening to this speech, it brings you to the reality of the situation which in itself is dark and not something most would want to engage themselves in. For me i didn't feel that connection as well but i suppose for the topic one must set aside concern about interest when listening to this and just pay attention.

      Delete
    5. I think that Ty gave a very honest opinion to the video and to some extent I agree with what he said. There were a lot of sad and depressing parts to the video and that’s just not something that I really like to watch. I think that it was good that she exposed a lot of the horrors behind war but it was a sob story after a while. Like Ty, I didn’t connect with her on that deep of a level. I felt for her and I am sad that she had to experience those things but it’s just not something that I can empathize with because I haven’t experienced it for myself.

      Delete
    6. I can absolutely agree with you Ty. I felt as if she was speaking just to be heard, just because she can at the beginning but as she got in depth within her story I immediately felt like an ungrateful child. She went through something I could never possibly imagine myself going through and living each day the same as I am now. I also respect her for opening up to a public audience while not caring about the judgment she may receive. I feel as if we should appreciate our lives as it is now and be grateful that we did not experience such a tragedy.

      DeAnne Gainey ( using Erin's account)

      Delete
  8. Linai Weatherspoon

    I get the impression from the lady that she wants everyone to gain a traumatizing imagination from what she describes in the beginning. I was intrigued to hear what more she had to say, she had a great introduction. Storytelling true facts are a positive aspect to me; it entices the crowd of people to believe true statement and facts and also to believe what they would do if put in the situation. Connecting with the crowd is important; better interaction is almost guaranteed when you have the mind set of putting a little bit of yourself in your presentation, emotionally, physically and mentally. I get that kind of vibe as the lady presents her work. I can tell this experience changed her a little and put her perception on life to appreciate and cherish life. I saw a movie called Hotel Rwanda and I made the connect to when she brought that up. I was good to know what she was talking about. I agree with her opinion on war, and I know it’s hard to tell traumatizing events and I commend her for sharing her experience and speak about what happens in other countries that people don’t know about. my foreign editor forced me to go back to Baghdad where I had been reporting all throughout the Saddam regime and during the fall of Baghdad and afterwards, and I remember getting on the plane in tears, crying to be separated from my son, and while I was there, a quite famous Iraqi politician who was a friend of mine said to me, "What are you doing here? Why aren't you home with Luca?" And I said, "Well, I have to see." It was 2004 which was the beginning of the incredibly bloody time in Iraq, "I have to see, I have to see what is happening here. I have to report it." And he said, "Go home, because if you miss his first tooth, if you miss his first step, you'll never forgive yourself. But there will always be another war."

    And there, sadly, will always be wars. And I am deluding myself if I think, as a journalist, as a reporter, as a writer, what I do can stop them. I can't. This part of the speech really impressed me because sad to say but my opinion is everything is based on money, greed and power, and with everyone trying to get to the top that results in fighting, completion and war. And the Iraqi famous politician was right about there always going to be war. That makes me want to cherish the little stuff I don’t appreciate now; if I no longer had it or had the choice or and option I would feel incomplete and stuck.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I agree with quite a bit of what you have said, i will highlight the main points. I strongly agree with how you felt about herself being engaged in what she was saying. I see a lot of people saying she was monotone. I believe otherwise, she seemed subtle and informative yet still engaged in what she talked about and you could see she was trying to reach out to you with her words. Similarly i also felt as if her experiences changed her... not in a very good way though, for example she described the birth of her child as "a ray of hope." which seems to present a pretty grim emotional state on her terms. We as Americans are very disconnected from these frights, we are protected by the worlds largest and most powerful military force so speeches like these are very important for us to hear and let sink in so that we are not ignorant of the reality around us.

      Delete
    2. Briana Jones replies to Linai Weatherspoon

      I agree entirely with your blog post about how the reporter wants to grab the audience’s attention. She shows the importance of the tragedy that was taking place in another area and she does that by giving us that certain visual that creates variety of emotions. The way she delivered the news was effective because it got me interested straight from the beginning. I care about what she had to say with her facts making me wanting to know more. I feel that it is important to know what is occurring in other areas for many reasons, which made it easier for me to connect with the reporter and understand what she was saying. With her not only just doing her job but also adding her passion into what she wanted to be spread had made it linger in my head. I feel that it is cliché to say that money is root to all evil but it is actually proven from all ignorant people that has that as first thought because there are certainty other significant matters. Life may not be great at times but cherish it because I believe nothing can prepare you if there is worst to come.

      Delete
  9. While watching Janine di Giovanni's i started to feel almost depressed by her speech. She told a story on how she witnessed her bestfriend run through a crowd to give her own baby away to a complete stranger because she wanted a better life for her child. This part of her speech had me drawn in emotionally because it takes alot for a mother to give away her own child. As she talked about what she seen in Rowanda, and Seirra Leone you could hear the tone olin her voice. It sounded almost as if she was reliving the moment as she was talking about it. Another thing that suprised me is how dedicated she us towards being a journalist. She said that she could remeber crying to be apart from her son so she could go on the plane to write about the war. One thing i can take away from this is that no matter how bad you think your life is, there is always some one else thats life is ten times worser than yours.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I was actually emotionally touched by your response because I don’t know if other people felt the same way, but I also was saddened by her speech. When she was giving descriptions of what her friend experienced I was immediately feeling sympathetic. It is true that anything can happen like this to anyone. Like Janine di Giovanni said these people were living their ordinary lives and out of nowhere a tank came rolling down the street and soldiers were creating chaos. Also when the mom gave her son to a stranger to save his life, that is something that’s difficult for a mother to do but it shows that she is smart and strong enough to save her child’s life and make sure he is taken to a safe place. I would like to add that you had a few misspelled words but I’m sure it was an accident. Great job overall though.

      Delete
    2. I like that you had a different interpretation of Janine di Giovanni TED talk . Instead of a lesson of humanity you have collected one of thankfulness. Your statement illustrates the emotional components of Giovanni's speech. "One thing I can take away from this is that no matter how bad you think your life is, there is always some one else that's life is ten times worse than yours" Your reflection of the speech was touching.

      Delete
  10. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete

  11. War reporter Janine di Giovanni has reported news from several wars, wars in places like Bosnia, Syria and Rwanda. In her speech from TED, she describes her role as a reporter, “All I am is a witness. My role is to bring a voice to people who are voiceless...to shine a light in the darkest corners of the world” As I began to watch the video I thought that it would be about the political aspects of war and the stories of the soldiers. Never did I expect that it would be about the common people, living at home as war is going on. What stood out to me the most throughout the whole speech was, “Most of all, I learned about love.” She goes on by telling the audience that the people going thru such a tragic war was still able to help one another, they shared food, and would even try to send injured people to a hospital knowing that they would be endangering their own lives. At a time where food may be scarce and one’s life is at risk these people were still able to help one another showing the power of love and kindness. I believe that Giovanni was able to get her story and emotions to the audience in a good way.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Ashley Lawson

    By the end of this video, I was in tears. When war is mentioned, I choose not to pay attention to it. I try to avoid the subject simply because I am aware of what goes on, but I do not like. I must admit, I ignore it because I know there is nothing I can do to change it. Like her Iraqi politician friend said to Janine di Giovanni, “’There will always be another war.’” However, to know that people live Giovanni risk their lives to report it and let the world know what’s going on, moves me emotionally. When she described the rows of chairs down the street, almost a mile long, I began to tear up. “…and in that road were more than 12,000 red chairs, empty, and every single one of them symbolized a person who had died during the siege, just in Sarajevo, not in all of Bosnia, and it stretched from one end of the city to a large part of it, and the saddest for me were the tiny little chairs for the children.” It is amazing that such reporters have the courage to face these things, while I sit behind a computer admiring her. The fact that she sees the bad and still says she learns from war astounds me.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ashley made the statement, “I ignore it because I know there is nothing I can do to change it.” At times I feel this way to. For, I am not of high enough power to end a war. Sometimes this is the only thing that I feel can make a difference. However, there are certain things that people can do such as help with supplies, write letters, etc. I do however; agree with some of Ashley’s points. However, I personally am not a very emotional person. Therefore, I was not as moved and emotional as Ashley. Just like Ashley, what had the greatest impact on me, was the 12,000 red chairs. More specifically, the death of the little children. When I first watched the video I didn’t understand why a reporter would risk their lives just for the story. However when Ashley made the statement, “It is amazing that such reporters have the courage to face these things” It made me have more respect for Janine di Giovanni. It also made me feel for the decisions she made.

      Delete
    2. I agree with Ashley to about being emotionally affected. The way she described events in such detail made it feel like the reader or the person that was hearing her talk, was actually there. I also agree with the statement made by Ashley when she said "i ignore it because i kno there is nothing i can do to change it" because in some parts of the video i did the same thing.

      Delete
  13. (Anna Gleason Responding to video)
    I think that, as insightful and meaningful as this womans stories were, she gave a very one-sided view of war in general. She tells only the atrocities, which were numerous, significant, and valid, but they are one aspect. She seemed to imply that the events that she witnessed could be attributed to war. This is, admittedly, not a strong-founded observation, but it can be argued with the numerous mentions of “the atrocities of war” and all of the negative things that she associates with war. These millions of horrible tragedies that occurred in various regions of the world are the result of hundreds of other conflicts happening with little to no involvement of the people who were inevitably and abhorrently affected. That being said, I think that there is a lot of knowledge to be gained from listening to this talk. Perspective is something that can always be gained, regardless of a persons life or history. Hearing about all of the other things happening far away from me, I got a sense of the importance of global knowledge. The terrible things that this woman witnessed are, to an extent, caused by lack of understanding. To understand what happens to people and why is something with a value beyond measure.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Matt Rapoza

    Ms. Parker

    Journalism

    28 January 2013


    I find it very interesting and respectable that Janine di Giovanni states. “I had the honor of being there during that three year siege.” She saw her circumstance as an opportunity and not simply damnation, as most other individuals would presumably feel. She truly exemplifies the sheer horror of a city and its people, as they faced an immediate transition between peace and normality to a deadly battleground. She alludes to the fact that individuals do not want to believe that danger can strike anywhere at any time, and choose to veil their own instinct and perception. I find this theme to be very close to home, especially for American citizens, as some choose to open their eyes and expose the cruel world on the outside, while others take advantage of the luxuries of protection. She makes the loss of life feel very real with the imagery of a road spanning a mile with bodies piled twice as high as her, as she knew that sheer numbers meant very little without meaning. She described her role in reporting wars was to “shine a light in the darkest corners of the world,” which eloquently portrays a terrifying role that can truly make a difference, as so many individuals refuse to see that which is beneath the darkness.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    2. I agree with Matt. Janine brings light to a lot of things that many people look past. Many Americans aren't concerned with the issue of war occurring on American soil until it actually happens. Although I believe that Janine's role as a journalist is important, she is only influential to a certain extent. Again, many may feel sympathetic and yet not take action in their beliefs. Her listeners actually instead realize the importance of life and makes them appreciate their life. Although Janine can’t bring all Americans to this revelation, she still continues to tell her stories that largely influence many people.

      Jessica Vongxay

      Delete
    3. Mariah Gonzalez

      I completely agree with Matt’s statement of individuals tending to not believe that danger can strike anywhere at any time and that they choose to veil their own instinct and perception. In her story, Giovanni says “people don’t want to believe it’s coming, so they don’t leave before they can.” Although people may know deep down that a war is about to cause so much destruction and change to their entire life, they wish to ignore this knowledge. Individuals do not want to believe that harm can come to a home that they have always felt secure in. Relating to the saying of “ignorance is bliss,” by blocking out the truth, or “veiling” it as Matt says, people are able to shield themselves from reality before they have to face the chaos that will eventually occur.

      Delete
    4. Ashley Lawson

      Wow. Matt hit the nail on the head. I agree with how he mentioned that numbers don't have the same effect as the imagery. Anyone can say twelve thousand people died, and it doesn’t affect people the same way as saying twelve thousand red chairs lined up over a mile long represented every person who died. Same with the bodies piled up. “She alludes to the fact that individuals do not want to believe that danger can strike anywhere at any time, and choose to veil their own instinct and perception.” Exactly. I rarely ever think something tragic like that can happen close to home. Then again, look at the Newtown shooting and the Webster shooting, who was expecting something like that to happen?

      Delete
  15. Mariah Gonzalez
    Ms. Parker
    Journalism
    28 January 2013


    At the start of listening to Janine di Giovanni tell her story, I automatically admired the way she not only presented herself, but the way that she captured the audience’s attention. Confident, the way she starts her story reminded me of the way an individual might write an essay. Starting off with a strong sentence of “this is how war starts”, she then expands while connecting everything back to the idea of what the start of a war really does to a location; the same way an essay has a topic sentence that connects each point made in each paragraph.
    Although I may be the only one who sees this connection, Giovanni’s starting dialogue of war beginning in the midst of everyday life holds the attention of the audience because it is relatable to the crowd. Even though not every individual may have personal experience when it comes to war, individuals are able to relate to participating in activities that are a part of an ordinary routine and can imagine those activities being disrupted. By bringing up the topic of everyday life being stopped in the most damaging way, Giovanni is able to expand upon her story while immediately having individuals put themselves in the shoes of someone having to re-structure their entire life. The thought of being involved in war and having to change my entire lifestyle impacted me greatly, which is why this is one part of the video that I liked the most.
    Another part I liked was when Giovanna voiced that by visiting these war filled locations and reporting such bloodshed and destruction, she was able to realize how much individuals, such as herself, take for granted. She was able to find compassion and kindness in such a dark time and I like that she was able to see something more than the violence that surrounded her. I myself have always liked the fact that visiting a place that is way worse off than where you come from helps you gain perspective on your own life, making you realize how much more grateful you should be for what you have. Overall, Janine di Giovanni’s story was very emotional but I think it showed a lot of people that they should be thankful for the life they have since it could always be ten times worse.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I agree when it comes to Giovanni's confidence. There are different ways to get the audience's attention. Giovanni could have came up with a speech that left people in tears. While some may have teared up from her reflection, others may have looked at it as more of a wake up call. It's also important that you mentioned how she said she also takes things for granted. She doesn't exclude her selfish acts, but simply talks about them to stir up some sort of response from the people listening.

      Delete
  16. Janine di Giovanni's war journalism is one of the bravest things a person could occupy themselves with. She puts herself in danger in order to spread word of the horrors of war and bring a voice to the voiceless. I was following Ms. Giovanni's speech all the way until she said this; "...there sadly will always be wars and I am deluding myself if I think as a journalist, as a reporter, as a writer, what I do can stop them." I don't believe that she would risk her life so often if she didn't feel that she was affecting change. If her ultimate goal is for families to have some involved breakfast conversations then I don't think she's in this for the right reasons. There would be no point in sharing the voices of those in need if the people who hear just continue on with there lives nonchalant. I'd been told that one studies history so that mistakes from the past won't be repeated. If no one takes action then we might just as well be making backward progress. I think that somewhere in her heart she believes that a few good people will step up and help to deter these supposedly inevitable tragedies.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I agree with you Elijah. War journalists have to have massive amounts of courage to be able to put themselves into those situations. Journalists put themselves into precarious situations and they're going to be affected. I agree with you in not following her when she said that, as a journalist, she doesn't feel like she's making a difference. There has got to be a reason you willingly put yourself in danger to get the story out there. And if you feel like all you're doing, the traveling, the writing, the speaking, isn't making a difference, that you're not being heard, then you need to be more attentive. People care. It may take a lot for "the people" to be able to do something, but there are still people out there doing everything they can.

      Delete
    2. I am glad someone has some of the same views I thought of too. Giovanni is very couragous to do the work she does."I'd been told that one studies history so that mistakes from the past won't be repeated. If no one takes action then we might just as well be making backward progress." I respect this response and this quote Elijah has said. i agree with this and i think that is a very wise statement but also at the same time the truth.

      Delete
    3. Word, Elijah. I feel you, bruh.
      War is never really a easy topic to cover, let alone hear about, but the fact Giovanni really took the time to cover this topic is pure bravery. She observed all the harsh aspects about it; how it affected the people, the lives that were lost both physically and economically, and how she described the risky measures people had to go through for safety. Sending off children to a safer place, knowing that they probably see their Mother or father again is heartbreaking. She's really a brave woman for getting in front a crowd and telling so about it.

      Delete
    4. Mariah Gonzalez

      I completely agree with your statement that Giovanni’s participation in war journalism is one of the bravest activities a person can involve themselves with. For an individual to put themselves in such danger and risk their own life in order to possibly save another’s takes great courage and because of this I respect not only Giovanni, but every other war journalist. I, like you, also disagree with the fact that Giovanni believes that she cannot stop the wars that she is reporting. Although she does not hold the power to stop/call off a war like the president does, having a job that reports the crimes of war will bring attention to what is going on. By bringing attention to the war, Giovanni is presenting the truth of what is occurring, and is therefore helping end the war by bringing awareness. By informing others, individuals that do hold the power of ending a war will realize the harm it is causing and may put an end to all of the death and destruction. Therefore, I think Giovanni’s job is much more important than she believes it is.

      Delete
  17. Grace Lopata-Linn
    Janine di Giovanni response

    I thought Janine di Giovanni's story was very inspring, to hear all the horrible things she witnessed was incredible. Through out her speech I kept thinking to myself " I could never do this", there is no way. This woman puts her life in danger everyday when she goes to work, and that is something I cannot begin to imagine. But Janine did not even refer to what she does as "work", she spoke of what she does with pride in her voice.

    We always see things about wars going on in other nations on the news or hear about them on the radio. Do we feel bad? Yes of course. We donate to the cause and pay respect to the troops, but none of us know what it feels like to be in a war zone. When she tells the story of her friend who was walking down the street of Sarajevo, Bosnia, like any other day and suddenly sees a tank coming down the street knocking everything down in its path. I cannot even imagine what I would be thinking in that moment or how I would react. It's amazing to think how many people are changed by war, even the one who aren't fighting it but are still very much a part of it, like journalists. When Janine explained how she had the honor of surviving in the siege in Bosnia, I was interested in how proud she sounded and how what she had learned made her a better person. Janine's story mad me take a step back and think about the kind of person I am.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I agree with your ideas about how detached we are as a society from conflicts around the world. We have no idea what it's like, and when we listen to a speech like the one that Giovanni gave, it's very difficult for us to connect with what she's saying and understand how it actually feels. In many cases we probably even try not to imagine it, since it's so horrifying. I think this contributes to the attitude many people in America have towards situations like this, which is that there is nothing we can do to stop people from suffering through these tragedies. Giovanni, by just making this speech, is showing us all what we can do, which is bring awareness to the situation, or maybe just reflect on what we may take for granted.

      Delete
    2. I agree with Grace's observation about how Giovanni doesn't refer to her occupation as "work". Rather, it is a lifestyle for her, and she is obviously completely dedicated no matter the cost. We can all make criticisms about her appearance, her tone, her lack of linguistic prowess. But Grace brings up a key point in her reaction to the video. When all is said in done, you have to ask yourself,if you had the chance to leave tomorrow- would you do what this woman has done?

      Delete
  18. It may be easy for some of us to listen to Janine di Giovanni and comment on her tone or simply the ways she comes off to people. Others may look past the way she delivers this information and actually take in what she’s saying. At first I didn’t react to the way she was speaking, but what she was speaking of. It’s hard for us to imagine what it’s like to hand over our kids on a bus because we don’t have children. It’s hard for us to grasp the image of a tank plowing down the streets we walk every day because we’ve only seen war on a TV screen. Because we’ve never experienced war, it’s difficult for us to connect emotionally with Giovanni, but that doesn’t make her any less of a journalist. There are many parts of war that she may not be able to talk about simply because it would take too much time or it’s too hard for the average person to understand. She said herself that her intentions were to bring light upon the situation because she is well aware that she cannot change it. Like Giovanni, we are all witnesses. We see what has happened second handedly but may not have any personal connection with the past. As teenagers, we choose to ignore some important, life-changing events because the majority of us hate history. Little do we realize that history often repeats itself and nothing is inevitable. Giovanni’s speech is not a rant but instead a thoughtful, well-needed reflection.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I agree with you Gabi. I said the same thing-I don't have children to be parted from and I don't really know what it's like to see a tank coming down the street. I felt connected in some ways because I guess I could be considered as an average person doing everyday activities but the emotional connect wasn't there for me. One thing I didn't think of, that you did, was that we are just teenagers and it can be hard for us to care about world events sometimes. Personally, all the wars I hear about in the media just blend together and eventually leave my mind.

      Delete
    2. I agree! As teenagers, we don't really take the time to look at events like these and learn from them. With that, we end up repeating the same history just like the older generations before us. di Giovanni didn't need to scream or shout with fervor to get someone's attention and make them aware of something we often move on from. She let her words communicate themselves and that's what got to me. She's a journalist, yes. A witness and someone who's relaying all the monstrosities. We see it second handedly, but we still see it. This is a well-needed reflection, I agree.

      Delete
  19. Janine di Giovanni's reflection was very touching. The video grabs the viewer's attention right away. Her stories are so gloomy yet inspiring. In each of her reflections she talked about the darkest parts and yet she had a sense of hope in her tone. Her optimistic outlook on the war journalism is refreshing. The video may have left some in tears but with others it may have left them with a smile on their faces. Some may look at her reflections as sad but honestly like she was saying she is only giving the voiceless a voice. Though most cannot comprehend the dreadful experiences, many can feel the emotion that she expresses when she speaks. When she gives specific details like "and in that road were more than 12,000 red chairs, empty, and every single one of them symbolized a person who had died during the siege, just in Sarajevo, not in all of Bosnia, and it stretched from one end of the city to a large part of it, and the saddest for me were the tiny little chairs for the children," the audience can feel her grief and get a sense of her pain and the pain of the war in general. The way she goes about her experiences is really the most touching part. She connects with her audience by answering that one question that many have in the back of their mind "how can you possibly do all this and still be sane?" Her answer is that she helps "shine light in the darkest corners of the world."

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Janine di Giovanni's reflection was very touching but I do not think that the video grabs the viewers’ attention right away. I agree with Chantel when she says that her optimistic outlook on war journalism is refreshing. I love how positive Janine di Giovanni was. I felt the emotion that she expresses when she talked about the 12,000 chairs and I agree with Chantel when she said that the audience could feel her grief and sense of pain. Janine di Giovanni connected with the audience by sharing her emotions and expressing her pain. I also agree with Chantel when she says that Janine di Giovanni connected to the audience by answering one question.

      Delete
    2. I can agree with Chantel to a certain extent. The way she described Janine di Giovanni’s reflection sums up everything yet, I do not think she grabbed the attention of her viewers immediately though. It takes a while for the story to really settle in and create a visual of her story. By her tone, I do agree that there is hope in her voice. I love how you used quotes to support your opinions as well as metaphors. I applaud you and agree with your emotional affects when she described how parents wanted to save their children.

      DeAnne Gainey

      Delete
  20. I don't understand war. I really don't. I mean, if you are a decent human being, and you go to war and your "side" wins, how can you feel good? Ok, you won. Bravo. But do people really realize the results? All the destruction. All the lives lost. All the people who have to deal with that loss of life. If you have children, are you making the connection that those who die at your hands are someone else's children? Is this what you want your children to inherit? Where is the success, really? I give Janine di Giovanni mucho props for getting through that without crying. She definitely choked up a bit, but my gosh. Twelve thousand chairs representing all who were lost. Small chairs for the children. Oy. She touched briefly on Rwanda, the Hutus and the Tutsi, and the vicious slaughter of a million people. Its horrifying. I do not understand how someone can pick up a gun or a machete or a whatever and kill another human being. No one is better than anyone. Being certain ethnicity or of a tribal group does not make you better than someone who isn't the same. Its severely depressing. These kind of stories can shock a person every time they come on the news, but before you realize it, its just another story, another war, another number of casualties.

    ReplyDelete
  21. Becky Herring response to video

    There is no doubt that Janine di Giovanni is a very strong woman. To put herself in danger for the sake of reporting is pretty incredible. Her circumstances give her the ability to provide readers and listeners with not only the facts, but also the feelings of horrible events that take place during and after war. I was profoundly moved by the section where she spoke about going back to Sarajevo for the “reunion” and seeing 12,000 empty chairs occupy a section of the city. It must have been an unbearable experience, especially witnessing the small chairs that represented the perished children. Her descriptive words offer ethos to readers and listeners. Emotional appeal helps to really get the idea across and allow the message to sink in. I love the fact that she doesn’t just report wars because she is told to. She wants to report wars. For example, she talks about Syria and her work there. “I now cover Syria, and I started reporting it because I believed that it needs to be done. I believe that a story there has to be told.” This statement struck a chord in me. Her work is a cry for help. A cry for help for society miles away to acknowledge the fears and dangers of innocent people and to realize how easy life is when you’re not fighting for your life.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ashley Lawson

      I was also moved by the red chairs. It is an image that gets stuck in your head and like she said, her job is done then. I agree with Becky when she said, “Her work is a cry for help.
      A cry for help for society miles away to acknowledge the fears and dangers of innocent people and to realize how easy life is when you’re not fighting for your life.” However, I don’t believe that people will pay much attention to it. I think they’ll just let it go in one ear and out the other. I will personally never forget the images she portrayed in her speech, but some people are not as emotional or “profoundly moved.” :(

      Delete
    2. Kendall Dorman

      The image of the red chairs as a symbol of death sparked so much emotion. Just knowing what they stand almost brings you to tears. When Becky quotes “I believe that a story there has to be told,” This quote gave me a since of realization on how because of the war, so many people stories are lost like a never ending book.
      Janine di Giovanni’s speech “What I Saw in the War” gives us a vivid insight on the aftermath of war. War changes people… the only enemy is yourself choosing to fight a battle not thinking of the outcome, war is a chaotic battleground that has an effect on everybody.

      Delete
  22. Tara's response

    I will never understand how reporters like Janine di Giovanni voluntarily go into wars to write about their experiences. It must take an insane amount of courage and bravery. I admire her boldness and I liked hearing her stories. I appreciated the fact that she made her stories more relatable that way I was more interested in what she had to say. She had my attention from the very beginning of the speech because she opened up with talking about everyday activities. Things she mentioned such as planning a party or making a dentist appointment make it easy for me and other listeners to feel more connected to the rest of her stories. Her first story about the Bosnian woman seemed so unreal; I couldn't imagine that happening to me or anyone I know. Although I felt like I could relate to the story more since common people were going through these awful experiences, I still felt there was something missing. I wasn't fully emotionally connected because I have no idea how it feels to see a tank coming down the street or to have to leave my child because i’m being forced to go to a different country to report about a war. Yes, I can imagine, but I don’t really know how it feels.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I agree with Tara when she said that she admires her boldness. Janine di Giovanni did not have my attention from the beginning of the speech. I thought the beginning was very boring and it did not help me connected to the rest of her stories. I understand why Tara said that it was hard for her to be full emotionally connected but I think that hearing about these tragedies should make you feel some emotion. Janine di Giovanni’s speech made me sad and I could feel her pain so I really don’t understand how you could listen to her speech and not feel any emotions.

      Delete
    2. I agree with Tara in the fact that Janine di Giovanni has an insane amount of courage due to the fact that her job requires her to watch people die and report on it. Tara’s post is relatable because I was intrigued from the beginning of the speech as well. Another good point she made was that we do not know the true feeling of war and are not entirely connected emotionally because it is nothing we have experienced in our entire lives. Janine di Giovanni does do a good job of including us as to make us feel if we were really there.

      Delete
    3. I agree with you, Tara in many apsects of your response, your thoughts on Janine di Giovanni's speech matched a lot of what I was thinking. I also found the part when she was speaking of how her friend was living her everyday life when suddenly a war started in her town.It is so hard for us to imagine what people in a war zone have to deal with every day, And I also find it hard to really connect with the stories she is telling and what she is speaking about because no one can really know what its like to be in that situation.

      Delete
    4. Kendall Dorman
      I agree with Tara when she states how she has a great amount of respect for her and career. She says how brave Janine di Giovanni is for being able to deal with all of the death, and record the data. I understand why Tara said that she could not connect fully to the speech, except for parts such as the ones discussing situations in everyday life like going to the dentist. Janine di Giovanni’s speech made gave me a feeling of depression. I could feel the hurt for the people that were murdered however it was lacking emotion from the speaker.

      Delete
    5. GEORGE @ TARA

      Psssst yourself. Im glad you enjoyed the talk that Giovanni gave. It was moving and very emotional for her audience. I however still am having problems in Giovanni's delivery and her ability to relate her emotions to her audience. I feel like I missed the main point of her story because of its delivery. Maybe I need to get a new lens or something but I just didn't enjoy the talk as much as you.

      Delete
    6. George,
      You did miss the point. Perhaps you are succumbing to showmanship, that the audience needs flourishes and pizzazz to engage with the substance of what is being said. While these tools naturally augment a point, ask yourself how often that distract from the substance of a point, and by extension we respond to the showmanship- or rhetoric. Now ponder politics, religion or any other aspect of life that involves action and reaction.

      Delete
  23. Janine di Giovanni seems like a very experienced reporter who has seen a lot of terrible things. I thought her talk was slightly interesting, but was all over the place. The "war sucks" theme was very strong, but I don't feel like I learned much from the talk. This is not news. We know about these wars. We know that thousands, millions of people die in wars. We know that reporters are thrust into these dangerous situations to show the world what really happens. To quote The Dark Knight, what Giovanni talked about were situations that are "all part of the 'plan,'" meaning that the general public has been conditioned to take these types of stories in stride, to not think anything of them other than "Wow that's terrible, someone should do something about that." She was telling melodramatic war stories that we've heard before. Now, if she had explained some specific things she is doing to combat atrocities like those she witnessed, instead of just saying she reported on them and saw some stuff, then I would be interested. Maybe if she told me what I could do to help, I would have been a little more inspired by her talk. Oh well.
    And she kind of looks like Stifler's mom from American Pie.

    ReplyDelete
  24. When I heard about wars on the news, it's usually the same thing. There's the numbers, the politics that brought it all together, and if one ever look at the place that's embroiled in all of it, they just see fighting. One always sees what's going on in wars on TV day in and day out, and it desensitizes some. Going from your regular life one minute to trying to survive the next is something I don't understand and I don't think I'll ever understand it unless I go through it myself. So far, I've lived without terrible suffering and after reading Janine di Giovanni's speech, I'll always be grateful for the peaceful times I've had so far. 12,000 chairs in the street of Sarajevo was just terrible, especially the small ones that showed the kids lost. They all had lives, futures to think about and run to. All of Sarajevo did and so did the others in wars like Iraq. di Giovanni also admits that she had her own selfish thoughts in the process but it makes me relate as I would sympathize and move on with personal concerns that I thought were more important. Her story is something that I won't forget and move on.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I totally agree with you, Shantel. I was never really put in a situation of where I was never a victim of war or never really been in war crossfire, but her story really gave me the second- person view of how war affects an environment. How it can separate loved ones for long or permanent periods of time, how sudden it can occur, and how devastating the aftermath can be. It’s definitely a harsh thing to ever hear about. Janine di Giovanni really did pull an emotional chord on how the war affected people. New like this is never really great to hear.

      Delete
  25. There were many points in Janine di Giovanni’s speech when I lost track of what she was trying to say because of how long it took her to say it, but overall I found this to be very educating as well as touching. She used multiple good stories and anecdotes to really paint a picture of how destructive and painful war can be for a society. A few of her stories were a little long and sometimes hard to follow but I think each was very effective in helping the audience understand the gravity of the situation. I really liked that she was just stating things as they were, not trying to rally her listeners for change. I also liked that she outwardly admitted that while she gives people in wartime voices, her job will not have any influence over current or future wars. When she said that wars would never end, it made me feel very sad but I agree with her completely. She is insightful and realistic which made her presentation feel very genuine. She seems like an extremely interesting, intelligent and compelling journalist and I would really like to see some samples of her work.
    -Hannah Z

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I find it interesting that your insight on Janine Giovanni's feelings about her place as a writer were entirely contrary to mine. I was disturbed at the fact that Giovanni would suggest that what she does will never have any affect on war. Maybe it won't have an affect tomorrow or in the next ten years but although it may be sad that people are dying by the masses, it's even more disturbing that nothing can be done or will ever be.

      Delete
  26. Eysa Mohamed aka Habibi aka young GoodMan
    In response to Janine di Giovanni TED speech video.

    I honestly have never heard of this woman before, but in this TED clip I got an idea of who she is and what she does. In her speech Janine di Giovanni says "All I am is a witness. My role is to bring a voice to people who are voiceless.... to shine a light in the darkest corners of the world." . Janine is a journalist who has reported and witnessed many horrific events. She couldn't do much but bring some of the worlds problems to light. She shows the rest of the world what is going on, she tells of the empty chairs in Sarajevo, the piles of dead bodies in Rwanda and the war descending on the Syrians. She speaks of the mothers and children a lot. Thats all she really spoke of, she didn't really speak on the political reasons behind any of the wars, but maybe because she felt that she couldn't relate? i dont want to seem a sexist, but she could have spoken about the men that fought and lost their lives as well. She makes it seem like the women and children were the only victims in her speech, when most casualties were probably males. I dont support war, but i have lots of respect for soldiers and army personel who risk their lives for their countries and loved ones.

    ReplyDelete
  27. In “Janine di Giovanni: What I saw in the war” Janine di Giovanni talks with great detail on the situations she or friends in countered. The speech opened my mind and eyes to events that happening all over the world. How Americans are blind to what occurs around the world. In some parts of the world, war is almost an everyday thing that they have learned to live and cope with. A loss of a love one is just something they have to learn to overcome very quickly. She put a very realistic picture in the listener mind. As you listen you can’t help but to pay attention and feels a since of some type of emotion from anger to sadness. When she talk about to children and how they parents tried to give them to strangers to take them to a better life. It make you just hope things will never get that bad. When you have to depend on a stranger to try and give your kids a better future and just have the thoughts running through your head asking yourself , “was that a wise decision?” or “will I ever see my son or daughter again?” But the people continue to look on a positive side.

    _Donald

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I agree and disagree with some of Donald’s thoughts. I believe that often people have their own personal problems that they have to worry about. When the United States goes through problems, such as Hurricane Katrina, Hurricane Sandy and other events, no other nation is going out of there way to help us. However when they are experiencing times of turmoil we reach out to them with our military, by raising money and so much more.
      Sure certain aspects of her story, like giving your child away to a stranger, are sad, as you pointed out. That statement I completely agree with. However to say that, "Americans are blind to what occurs around the world," I disagree.

      Delete
  28. George Gombert

    Blog Post

    Janine di Giovanni is an award winning author and journalist who was recently asked to speak the TEDxWomen 2012 conference about her experiences as a journalist covering wars since the 1980s. Her global coverage of wars in the past three decades has taken her to Afghanistan, Rwanda, Bosnia, and many other countries during their darkest hours. Listening to her speak, their is no doubt that this is a person who has seen terrible things in her life. Her descriptions of regular people just trying to survive are both haunting and moving to listen to. While I respect Giovanni’s experiences, I found it hard to relate to her particular way of relating stories to an audience. Giovanni uses an incredible selection literary techniques during her talk but when she narrates her own words I found that they loose emotion and just become cold images in my head. The sorrow I felt was not directed toward the suffering people at war, but toward Giovanni herself. Her story was intended to make you remember the people she met. She said so herself in the last lines of her talk with the sentence “But what I do hope is that if you remember anything I said or any of my stories tomorrow morning over breakfast, if you can remember the story of Sarajevo, or the story of Rwanda, then I've done my job.” But I didn't remember those peoples stories. I remembered her standing on that stage telling me about these people that she couldn't help and how sorry I felt for her instead of the people shat she was trying to help. While her writing is great, Giovanni’s delivery during her talk seamed to put the real point of her speech in shadow.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. There* is no doubt.

      Lose*

      Bean Duke Approves

      Delete
    2. George. There is no way to interpret your writing other than as "bitching." Our journalism teacher was the first to point this out. Though she did not name who it was that was being a bitch, it was clearly you that she was referring to. In my own reflection on the speech I admitted to many similar feelings about her speaking ability and lack of eloquence. Though I do agree that her stage presence detracted from the impact of the message that she was trying to send, I have a profound respect for her profession and the good that she is bringing to other peoples on this planet. It is clear that you allowed yourself to be completely distracted from the subject matter of this TED talk and did not realize the true significance of the information that Janine di Giovanni was providing. Your blog post is just a little too bitchy for my taste. Stop being a bitch.

      Delete
  29. Quinton Smith
    When I hear her speak on the war how they were deprived of food and electricity, it brings back memories of how frantic everyone was during the power outage of 2003. As crazy as that seemed, it doesn’t even compare to the life she described in the war zones. I couldn’t imagine a power outage then seeing a tank coming toward me, feeling unsafe like someone could kill me at any moment.
    The points that struck me to seem more familiar to parts of America was when she spoke on going in the middle of the street dragging a snipped targeted body out of the middle of the street risking your own life, and how they had the 12,000 chairs and the smaller chairs to represent children. In America, things like the 20 children were shot at Sandy Hook, the 49 people shot during the Virginia Tech massacre, to every single death due to gang violence; those numbers don’t compare to the genocide in Rwanda. No death due to killing is acceptable in my eyes.
    One of my good friends came to this country from Bosnia, escaping the war with his family that survived. It touches my heart when he tells me about how his father was killed along with most of his uncles and cousins, how he was being carried by his mother through the shooting and the bombs that where going off outside of his home. I couldn’t even imagine being raised in environment where the closest people in your life can be dead at any given moment.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I agree 100% with you Quinton there is so much violence that goes on that we can't even imagine is true. We have little massacres like Sandy Hook and Virginia tech which we are saddened by and feel very sympathetically for. They also take up the media for weeks and weeks at a time, but what about all the kids over in Syria, Sierra Leona, Congo etc.. there is no voice for those children and adults. There are hundreds of thousands of kids dying across the world and nobody is there to stand up for them. Think about it we "the media/news" spend weeks on stuff like sandy hook but there is nothing on the news talking about massacres killing millions of people across the world. It just doesn't make any sense to me and its crazy that stuff like this is happening.

      Delete
  30. Leon Lin

    After listening to Janine Di Giovanni, there was a strong impression that people in society often take things for granted. We as humans tend to not understand those who suffer unless we have undergone the same sufferings. She realizes this, so in effort to get her message across she hopes that people will at least grasp the idea that there are always those who are less fortunate and those who bear more suffrage. “…But what I do hope is that if you remember anything I said or any of my stories tomorrow morning over breakfast, if you can remember the story of Sarajevo, or the story of Rwanda, then I've done my job...,” she states this in her closing remarks.
    I feel that after listening to her story, her life itself can be heroic for her to sacrifice her safety, precious time, and family so she can devoted it to her job is quite extraordinary. To part from her loved ones so she can let the people of society get a deep vision of what is happening in Bosnia, Rwanda and Iraq is self-sacrificing. Her actions itself are courageous, she could symbolize bravery thus she was able to do things that many wouldn’t dare to encounter and to witness such terrifying images of death is so daring.


    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Becky Herring responding to Leon Lin

      I agree with Leon’s interpretation. I felt the same way about Janine di Giovanni’s work. She deserves incredible praise for her sacrificing of safety, time and family to tell horrific stories of the dangers and fears people suffer through every day. I felt that one of the messages was that people do take things for granted. I think one of the main reasons for Janine di Giovanni’s work is to publicize the troubles that smaller countries face and the torture that the countries encounter on a day-to-day basis. I think she truly wants to try and make fortunate people fathom the horrors that many people face which they don’t have to worry about. I like how she does it in a non-forceful way. She remains calm and tells her stories as if nothing else in the world matters.

      Delete
    2. In response to Leon:

      " She was able to do things that many wouldn't dare to encounter" Yes exactly! I agree with Leon 100 percent. Maybe it is hard for us to connect with her story, and maybe it is a little " sob story" ish but would we ever do what she did? I don't think so. No she did not actually fight in the war, nor was the war affecting her nation or her people but that doesn't mean she was not changed by it deeply. I think if any one of us was put into a war zone as an outsider having to report about what was happening, we would be connected to the problem and war in someway. We would invest ourselves in the lives of those suffering and wish we could help in somehow. I think Janine di Giovanni is a very brave women, who did things I know I would not be able to do.

      Delete
    3. I agree with Leon that Giovanni was very sacrificing in the way she gave up the time with her family and her own safety to make people aware of what was going on in the world. I would also never be able to see any of these things much less go to another war and see even more suffering. Leon got it right saying “To part from her loved ones so she can let the people of society get a deep vision of what is happening in Bosnia, Rwanda and Iraq is self-sacrificing.”

      Delete
  31. Shannon .Kalia
    Watching the video of Janine di Giovanni was really moving. As I read it, I caught myself tearing up as she discussed her friend walking through Sarajevo, and seeing the tank, and then how a siege followed for three years. I realized how much war could affect a society, like when she explained how “...it was a siege without water, without power, without electricity, without heat, without food...”, and how people were handing their children to people they didn’t even know in hopes of keeping them safe. I think it left me with an even more somber, sympathetic feeling when she recalls seeing that same street her friend saw the tank in, a few years later with 12,000 chairs in memory of those who died, and seeing the smaller chairs representing all the innocent children that died. It was really eye-opening to hear about because then I realized how many people die in war, and how she continues to tell the audience that there will always be wars, and how unfortunate this is.
    This video really gave me a lot of insight about how awful war is, and gave me a new respect for people that are reporters. She recalls giving birth to her son in 2004, and how she would leave to go reporting. When I thought about it at first, I wondered why anyone would go to a country at war to report in when they could be home with their child. But when she explained that by doing her job, she was acting as “...a voice to people who are voiceless...”, it really moved me because she cared about these people so much and reporting their stories to as many people in the world as she could, and I think that’s very selfless, brave and caring of her, and something that needs to be done.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hannah Z

      I really like the point you made about her selflessness, I thought that was a really important part of her presentation as well. People definitely take journalists for granted, especially those covering war stories. The fact that a person will give up important moments with their children to go to foreign countries, put themselves in danger and report on the terrible events in war is truly amazing. I completely agree with you, this was a really moving presentation.

      Delete
  32. Junwan Ge
    I appreciate the fact that in the end of the speech, she acknowledges the fact that wars can't be stopped and they'll continue on happening no matter what. As long there's a force that's not in harmony with you, you can only choose between surrendering and defending yourself. By the end of a war, humans will see the destructions of war and learn to approach the situation differently, creating peace and freedom. As a journalist, Janine di Giovanni puts in great efforts in reporting, in the hopes to carry out the happenings of war, let people know what's going on. However, eventually a new generation of people rise, and they won't understand until they experience it on their own. It's a pretty helpless situation that circulates over and over.
    I find it weird when children's live carry more weight than others, "and the saddest for me were the tiny little chairs for the children." sounds odd to me, it's as if those same children were in the form of adults, it wouldn't be as sad. Maybe it's because children are viewed as innocent beings, but when they grow up, that image will be lost. That shouldn't mean their live doesn't value as much though.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You make a good point in the fact that when children are put in harms way anyone else who was hurt is completely ignored in the stats. In events such as the recent school shooting in Newtown, Connecticut, or the Birmingham bombing in 1963, the children's lives have always held more value in the media's eyes. It probably has to do with the fact that before they have their fair share of life experiences someone has decided for them that their time is up. The passing of youths as always been tragic because the older you are the more you've had time to think about and the more prepared you are for death.

      Delete
    2. Your opening statement certainly grabs my attention because the end of the speech really spoke to me too. i came to the conclusion also that war will never end while money, power and greed rest asure in life. the choice as you say " surrendering and defending " are decisions that will affect futher down the path of life and that takes thought, that's not an easy task. " By the end of a war, humans will see the destructions of war and learn to approach the situation differently,". I don't know if i agree with this completely because not everyone learns from their mistakes the first time and some people are more challenged then other in a negative and positive way. i agree with your final statements about the children and you are 100 percent right. Children pay the cost of war witout being a factor contributed and are later forgot as time willows away, that's very sad.

      Delete
    3. Responding to Junwan
      I agree with Junwan, Janine does put in much effort to deliver the war news to people around the world. The fact that she puts so much effort into such a dangerous job is great, for these stories must be passed on for people to read and get knowledge of. “Maybe it's because children are viewed as innocent beings” I also agree with this. The section of the speech where Janine talks about little chairs that were placed out for the children that died due to the war really got to me. Those young, innocent children’s live were taken because of adult issues.

      Delete
  33. Taquan

    Looking at the video" Janine di Giovanni’s" you will quickly realize that the woman in the video is stating foreign issues of the world . Her intention behind this was to bring the issues to the viewers attention not only for acknowledgement but for compassion toward the less fortunate countries involved in violent wars, genocide and other cruelties inflicted on individuals that are easily over looked and not noticed as we go about our lives of comfort. The video overall was an humanitarian message the woman wanted the viewer to remember her words and the topics as she stated when she said, “But what I do hope is that if you remember anything I said or any of my stories tomorrow morning over breakfast, if you can remember the story of Sarajevo, or the story of Rwanda, then I've done my job." The woman's efforts through the course of the video where commendable and very affective .

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Briana Jones replies to Taquan Hardaway

      I agree with you somewhat because I do not believe she was talking of foreign issues of the world only. I felt that her topic was to only name what she was being surrounded for her job. But with her including her passion and humanistic way into her writing it was easy to describe war in general rather it is home front or in a third world country. Not just foreign place has issues and try to resolve it with war, all human beings select this path if the issues is that important to them. As for me the video receive my attention for it was speaking of humans being treat like they are inferiors and should not be allow. It is important that we know of it even though we do not dwelt in the war or area that is greatly impacted. At the end of your blog I strongly agree with you about the reporter’s efforts to make her work worthy.

      Delete
  34. Briana Jones
    I remember the stories that Janine di Giovanni, the reporter, had told in the video and therefore her job is done. Her work of journalism on wars effecting communities have taught her “everything, not just about being a reporter, but also about being a human being.” She learned a great deal of aspects to live in the world while giving news to the people. During the time of tragedy there was compassion, heroes, sharing, camaraderie and love still able to be found. There was mixed emotions while getting the job done but that was the humanistic of the writing. With that the audience could relate and be involved in any way that would benefit victims of war. I believe her time spent on her work was not for the money but for her passion that was deep for journalism. Her journalism makes differences when people read her news of the occurrences of tragedies in other locations. Her work influenced her so much that her son name was influenced by the sightings she saw and told others about. She is able to give voice to victims who are not cared about until brought to the spotlight on bad terms. With the things she said it helps prove to me that there is a cycle made of good and bad aspects of life to show that bad is only known because is good and vice versa. The work of journalism shows that people don’t have to be in the direct line of fighting on the battle field to be influenced by war.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Nah'Tivah Ross
      I absolutely love the last two sentences of this response, I agree with them completely. The only reason we know what bad is, is because there is good, which i have always found a bit scary and intriguing. Furthermore we always hear about the soldiers and the news telling us to support the troops, but what about the civilians being affected by the war? Is there any way we can support them? i think as Americans we need to not only think about our people, but also others lives who are being affected just the same, maybe even worse than ours.

      Delete
  35. Kierra Mealing

    I though that Janine di Giovanni’s speech I was very sad and emotional. Her tone was consistent and at times very boring but I was able to feel some emotion. When the speech first started I was bored but as it went on and she told more stories I was able to feel emotions. He stories were very depressing but they did show us a different point of view for once. Janine di Giovanni described to us how women and children were affected by the wars. That caught my attention because everyone always forgets about the women and children. Even though her stories were hard to connect with I still commend her for being able to go to these different parts of the world and being able to shine light on these tragedies. Janine di Giovanni is a very strong woman and the fact that she actually risked her life for reporting is incredible. I think that Janine wanted to not only provide the listeners with facts but she also wanted them to know how it felt to live through these wars. The audience got emotional when Janine di Giovanni started talking about the 12,000 red chairs, they were shocked and couldn’t believe that many people had been killed. Janine di Giovanni is incredibly brave reporter and although her tone was boring I was still able to learn about the tragedies and feel the emotions she wanted me to feel.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I disagree with Kierra when she said that it was boring because Janine di Giovanni kept my attention throughout her entire speech. But I agree with you when you talked about women and children in wars. Whenever someone mentions war or soldiers people always think what brave men we have a soldiers. People forget that women and children are involved in wars too, whether they are a victim or a soldier. I also agree that Janine di Giovanni is a very brave woman. Anyone that risks his or her life to go into war, so they can share their experiences if they survive, is a very bold person.
      ~Tara

      Delete
    2. I think you made some good points but i also feel like she caaptured my attention from the beginning. She was very interesting and her stories were touching. I did not find her tone boring. I thought her tone was hopeful yet she had a bit of sadness in her tone as well. I like that you identified that she is strong women. I also like how you pointed out key facts like the 12,000 red chairs. Overall, I did agree with everything you said. I find it interesting how you say "although her tone was boring I was still able to learn about the tragedies and feel the emotions she wanted me to feel." I fell like you should have elaborated further.

      Delete
  36. Ja nai

    In this video the speaker specifies how the earth is dangerous due to pollution and global warming. Global warming is the increase of Earth's average surface temperature due to effect of greenhouse gases, such as carbon dioxide emissions from burning fossil fuels or from deforestation, which trap heat that would otherwise escape from Earth.This can be a potential problem because the earth can over heat. He mentioned that the earth heating up is like an asteroid on a collision course with the earth. An asteroid is numerous small solar system bodies that orbit the Sun.He then speaks out to say that he really care about his grandchildren and that he doesn't want anything to harm them."Most of all I learned about love. Even in the midst of terrible destruction and death and chaos, I learned how ordinary people could help their neighbors, share food, raise their children, drag someone who's being sniped at from the middle of the road even though you yourself were endangering your life." The speaker is referring to harsh times that he had to encounter and how love conquered hate. He helped people even though he was endangering himself.

    ReplyDelete
  37. Shamira McClain January 28, 2013 Day 1 (Janine di Giovanni)

    When I first started listening to “Janine di Giovanni: What I saw in the war” I was surprised. Not too often do you hear a woman discussing a war. By giving a woman’s perspective of the war, it allows you to see things differently. A woman’s perspective is also able to engage more people into the story. For me personally, as soon as I heard “miniskirt and high heels,” and “young mother,” I became a lot more engrossed into her story, and this was just the beginning.
    Janine di Giovanni describes her experiences in a great amount of detail. By doing this she allows her audience the ability to get a vivid picture of the things she saw and felt. It is questionable if a guy would have been impacted by the same things and share similar things that she has. For example, throughout her speech she is constantly discussing children. In my opinion if this had been a guy recapping their experiences they would have focused more on the explosions, debris, etc.
    As she recaps on her experiences she speaks in a way that reaches out to the emotional side of many people. She does this by connecting to children, families, and more. When discussing the topic of war we often don receive that side. Therefore it makes her speech a lot more effective than the typical bombs, bodies, and destruction.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Becky Herring responding to Shamira McClain

      I agree with part of Shamira’s response. I feel that the emotional aspect of Janine di Giovanni’s story contributed a lot to the overall impact of the video. However, I don’t think it is fair to say that a man is not capable of conveying the same message. Of course, the story wouldn’t have been as profound if she had just spoken about the explosions and debris of the war, but I don’t feel that’s all a man would speak about. I feel that if anyone, male or female, experienced what Janine di Giovanni has experienced they would have just as much detailed, graphic and emotional stories to tell.

      Delete
  38. Nah’Tivah Ross
    As Janine Giovanni spoke of war I was compelled and annoyed by the calmness and the control that she had of her herself and her voice. I liked her tone of voice considering what she had been through and seen in her life. I appreciated the fact that she wasn’t crying and putting on a show for her audience, although she seemed well rehearsed at times in her speech. Although I believe her intentions were to just teach of war, I felt that she was trying to get a reaction out of her audience through a very cliché manner; with her perfect makeup, nice tone of voice and ending with a “powerful” statement. This upset me a little, however I did feel and understand some of the statements she made that struck me emotionally. For example when she said “And she remembers struggling with her mother to the front, crowds and crowds of people "Take my child! Take my child!" And passing her son to someone through a window.” This statement made me think of how it would be like to have to give your child to a stranger not knowing what was going to happen to him, when only yesterday you were thinking of seeing his wedding day. The last statement she made that had me thinking about the meaning of life shortly before she exited was when her friend said to her "Go home, because if you miss his first tooth, if you miss his first step, you'll never forgive yourself. But there will always be another war." It made me think about my life and how much I as an American take for granted with all of the horrific things that have occurred across the ocean.

    ReplyDelete
  39. Ryder
    When I originally attempted to complete this assignment, sitting in class with one earpiece in, surrounded by the commotion of the computer lab, I missed a great deal of the emotional substance that is included in this short speech. Frequently turning my head and my attention away from the computer screen, my first impression was inaccurate and not fully composed. Upon a second visit to the TED talk, this time reading the transcript of the speech, I was able to absorb the information contained and formulate more educated opinions about the speaker and the subject matter. Though I do not doubt the credibility of the speaker and I have much respect for her profession, I found that her speaking could at times be ineloquent, detracting from the significance of the material that she was covering. Though it was at times distracting, her points were clearly made and supported. It wouldn’t be fair to judge a person of such outstanding morals on their public speaking ability anyway. She has experienced and witnessed awesome acts of terror and of goodness that no doubt have much deeper meaning to her than can be described with words. The work that she does is highly admirable, as she is able to give a voice to those that have none by reporting on these wars, seemingly without much recognition until this TED talk. It’s some really cool stuff, and I’m thankful that people are willing to risk their lives in this manner for others. She’s a cool lady for that.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. George @ Ryder

      I strongly agree about what Ryder has said in his post. I believe his point about Giovanni's tone is spot on and accurately describes my interpretation of Giovanni's TED talk. I believe that Ms. Giovanni is a wonderful and skilled writer but when she vocalizes her writings her tone distracts from the point of her speech. I still think that Giovanni is an amazing person for what she has done but as far as speaking goes, I'm not that big a fan of her.

      Delete
  40. Meghan Rebholz


    I find it very courageous for reporters, like Janine di Giovanni, to place themselves in extremely dangerous situations in order to bring light to information about events happening all over the world. The details she used in her speech about events she either witnessed or heard from friends greatly affected my emotions. It is very hard for me to listen to stories about woman having to hand over their child to strangers just so they won’t be harmed, or one million people being slaughtered. Being a person who has never been in an area with war around me, it is difficult to imagine these events truly happening. Even though I can’t personally connect with her stories, they moved me.
    Janine di Giovanni concludes her speech by stating, “All I am is a witness. My role is to bring a voice to people who are voiceless.” I felt like this brought everything she said in her speech together and expressed what she felt her role was as a reporter. She is able to make people aware of events occurring all over the world and hopes that she impacts someone’s life with her words. As a reporter, she believes that if people are remembering her stories days after they have read them, then she has done her job.





    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This is very well written and i couldn't help but to agree with everything you're saying. There hasn't been a war on American soil for many years. We weren't even born when there was so its hard to imagine things like this are happening around the world. You also used the quote by Janine " My role is to bring a voice to people who are voiceless" which also stood out to me.

      Delete
    2. I agree with practically everything that Meghan has said. I too, find Janine very courageous for placing herself “in extremely dangerous situations in order to bring light to information about events happening all over the world.” The stories that she tells about her experience and others experiences also affected my emotions. It too, is hard for me to listen to such stories. It left me with a very haunting feeling and the fact that all those lives were lost is just saddening. Janine is doing a good job with delivering these war stories to people around the world. She is doing what she says her job is, which is to “bring a voice to people who are voiceless.”

      Delete
  41. Kendall Dorman
    When hearing words such as “chaos” brings terror to the mind with a mindset of negativity. When you hear words such as “love” makes one feel joyous and puts them in a mindset of positivity. Janine di Giovanni’s speech “What I Saw in the War” gives us an insight of war and what is to follow afterwards. Hearing her words of wisdom and experience changes a person’s envision of war, no longer do you just think of shots being fired or soldiers who have died… you are put in a “behind the scenes” type of field where you are that person. She says how you learn from war. She says how when you see the survivors, most of them can be considered heroes… heroes who want to change for the better. Janine di Giovanni states how she is only a witness “my role is to bring a voice to people who are voiceless” she states how she cannot stop war, and how war is inevitable. She says how hope is the answer to war, love is the answer to chaos, but how it is a cycle of life to have war. I cannot reflect to her statements, nor can I relate. All I can go off of is what research/news is available to me. “War is peace. Freedom is slavery. Ignorance is strength.” ― George Orwell, 1984 a strong worded quote stating how the backward concepts on war. People seem to think that to get to peace you must execute what you feel is in the way of a peaceful living. Often this refers to people, for reasons such as a difference in religion, difference in race and for where you come from. Situations like the one in Rwanda which was based off of a racial problem. When one is “free” during war… you are limited on what you can and cannot do, or where and where not to go. You become a slave to war because you no longer have control over situations in your life, when war is present you abide by its rules because war is now the “dictator” of your area. Ignorance is strength can be defined as how power changes people. When a person receives too much power, it usually gives them in a way a “cocky” attitude and a high level of nationalism. Pride takes over and shows in a negative manner ending in death and slaughter. War was created as a way to settle differences… and in the past it was a battle between soldiers… now nobody is safe. You must learn from war, because where you see chaos there is love.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I fully agree with you. One statement that i liked the most is " when one is free during war.... you become limited on what you can do" because when there is war, it becomes a main part of your life and you can not control it

      Delete
  42. Samantha Scheib

    Janine Di Giovanni’s TED talk was very depressing. Obviously it wasn’t suppose to be a feel good story because was never makes anyone feel better. When she talked about the 12,000 people that dies it was sad, but when she goes on to talk about the million people she saw killed in Rwanda, it is very haunting . The image she put in your mind of bodies being piled twice her height at least a mile down the road and that just being a small percentage of them is a very sad thought. But when you think about it a million people is a small percentage of eh people killed in Rwanda. One country. There are wars in multiple countries and if any of them are half as bad as Rwanda or Bosnia the world is going to have serious problems. It makes me wonder how our country was so upset when the children were killed in Connecticut and yet at this point many people have moved passed that. There are hundreds of children killed in Rwanda and we manage to overlook this because of the fact that it didn't affect us. The fact that 20 children, and 6 adults being killed had our nation in mourning. At this point the only people that seem to remember are the ones directly affected. Its this type of thing that allows wars to continue the fact that if your not directly affected you moved passed the numbers you are told and you just start to think that its part of life. the way Giovanni went about presenting this information was calm and collected, and it made me wonder "how can she have seen all these things and not given up on humanity?" This story was very eye opening and made me realize how we as people seem to ignore so many injustices in life.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I agree with Sam about the fact that Giovanni's story was "haunting". However, I don't believe she aimed to depress people. While she touched on the importance of knowing that these tragic events are happening, she was a lot more positive than she could have been, considering what she has seen and done. She spoke about the "love" she experienced in the midst of hell, and how these experiences have helped her to see the stark contrast in her own life and how lucky she is to have a "voice". Yes, she may have not been as eloquent as she could have, but to be able to see the good in horrific situations is an amazing thing.

      Delete
    2. these stories were very haunting and I think you're totally right that a person is more affected and remembers mostly if it happens to them or in their country/close to home. and its a sad realization. there are people killed every day but why does it take multiple deaths to make a story. why does it take high numbers for people to notice. we're surrounded by violence. some media promotes it for goodness sake. why?

      Delete
  43. Brittany McLamore
    Janine di Giovanni has covered several wars since her start in the 1980’s. In her TED talk she didn’t cover the politics in war and she instead covered the citizens of the places war and conflict has struck. She specifies 3 conflicts in particular the war in Bosnia and she briefly refers to the genocide in Rwanda and her current coverage in Syria. She also talks about what she has learned being a reporter of wars and conflict for more than 20 years. di Giovanni says that the conflict Bosnia didn’t just teach her about being a reporter it taught her about being a human being. She gives descriptions of the death toll in Rwanda she says that people were lined at least a mile long and twice her height. Janine says seeing people die in front of her and not be able to save them was devastating but by reporting and bearing witness she feels she is giving a voice to those who are voiceless. Janine feels compelled to report in Syria because she sees the same happening in Syria that she witnessed in Sarajevo. Janine di Giovanni reports on these stories because she feels it needs to done.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Brittany I think by her covering so many war stories it has allowed her to grow and mature into the woman she is today. For someone to have witnessed the devastations of war and still is willing to return and report on war is a brave soul. I’m pretty sure she didn’t go into her career so brave and strong hearted but her career made her that way. I totally agree with your closing statement “Janine di Giovanni reports on these stories because she feels it needs to done.” We are lucky to have a reporter who is willing to go the extra the mile.

      ~Sidnee McDonald

      Delete
  44. Jessica Vongxay
    TED assignment
    War has always been a global issue that seemed to be unresolvable. When speaking of war, it seems that most people believe it to be an inevitable result for some countries. Janine di Giovanni speaks of her experiences as a war journalist. She tells of her stories of traveling to countries under attack or siege. In the beginning of her speech I thought that the point of her speech was to encourage her followers to try and stop war. Towards the end though, I realized that her goal was to spread awareness and share her experiences and how they have changed her. She stated, “and I say I have the honor and the privilege of being there because it's taught me everything, not just about being a reporter, but about being a human being.” Janine helps her followers realize that through all this destruction and violence, there is hope. She uses pathos to attract her followers/listeners. She almost wants them to reach a realization about the meaning of life. While America is not a perfect country, there should be some appreciation or gratefulness that there are no current wars that occur on American soil. She talked about her son and how he was her “miracle” through all the turmoil and destruction she has witnessed. I think that war is something that can be reduced but I don’t think it can be completely stopped. I also believe that although Janine is pushing for those to be grateful she should also realize that there are many different forms of war. America may not have any current wars on their soil but that doesn’t change the high crime rate in America. War can either destroy a country or bring power to another country. One thing war will always do is bring upon the death of many people.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "seemed to be unresolvable"... i like how you said that.

      Delete
    2. I agree with everything. We live in a world of Hawks and Doves. We are the Doves apparently. dont aske why I capitalized them.

      Delete
    3. I agree with Jessica, "War can either destroy a country or bring power to another country" I liked this quote and thought it was very well said because It seems as though Americans aren't aware of the impacts of the war in the middle east becasue it don't see the results of it firsst hand, where in Iraq and Afghanistan they do.

      Delete
  45. Sidnee McDonald

    When a war beings there are usually only two voices heard, the voice of the soldiers and the voice of the government. It is rare to hear the cries of the people in the times of devastion and turmoil. This is where for reporters come in and they report the devastation that is faced on the homefront from the victims affected by the war. This video was truly moving because the reporter in the video has a brave heart to truly commit and dedicate her life to reporting the tragedies of War from the perspective of civilians. Simply learning about genocide in history class moves me to tears so I couldn't imagine myself being in Rwanda and reporting the mass slaughter of millions of people. This has truly opened my eyes to how important journalist are and how much they must sacrifice in order to provide the general public with the knowledge we need in order to know whats going on with the rest if the world. The journalist in the video left her newborn at home in order to report on the war in Iraq. I believe that is a little extreme because you should always put your family first. Even with that being said her passion for journalism is remarkable.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Nah’Tivah Ross
      I fully agree with what Sidnee said about how there are only two sides to war, most of the time as we are at home we do not see the destruction the civilians deal with. The government and soldiers tell us what they want us to know and what they think we should know, but we will never know the truth. No one truly knows what’s going on over there. Furthermore a journalist is very important, they bring the chaos and danger wright into our living rooms when we least expected it. Lastly I now see how hard being a journalist can be and the sacrifices they have to make to show the world the real side of war.

      Delete
    2. You really speak the truth in this about how we will never "hear the cries" of the people. I feel that while reading your story I can get the emotion and feeling that the lady had been feeling when having to give up her child. I also agree that the video was really moving (once i DID watch it). I can see that you really put thought into this because in my eyes you put some of your soul into the words you used in order to create this writting.

      Delete
  46. Arieanna Burroughs
    Life is full of surprises, unexpected events happen every day. One event that has been going on for years, decades. The war, the war that has been taking a big toll on people’s lives. Families have been living on the edge in fear because one of their loved ones is a part of the war. News reporters have been reporting about the war around us, they are what keep the world updated about what is going on. Janine di Giovanni is a reporter who has traveled around the world to bring back stories about the war; also she is one of the reporters who were able to survive the war that was going on in Bosnia. She tells a story about her friend from Bosnia who has experienced the war with her own eyes.
    She starts off her report by reminding viewers that the events in life are unexpected. She says “One day you’re living your ordinary life, you're planning to go to a party, you're taking your children to school, and you’re making a dentist appointment.” - Janine di Giovanni. She begins to explain the horrific events that suddenly happened, “The next thing, the telephones go out, the TVs go out, there's armed men on the street, there's roadblocks. Your life as you know it goes into suspended animation.”- Janine di Giovanni. While she is speaking she has a sympathetic tone, showing that this was a very emotional and terrifying experience. And that this is no joke, this can happen to anyone. The story she tells about her Bosnian friend is what caught my attention because when she began to tell the story I immediately felt sad and shocked such things can happen. Her friend was described as a typical person you would see in your everyday life on their way to work. I began to create a picture in my mind of what it looked like when the tank was coming down the road and knocking everything in its path. People running and screaming trying to take cover. There were soldiers creating chaos. She quoted her friend who said, “I feel like Alice in wonderland going down the rabbit hole, down down down into chaos.”

    “Pushing with her infant son in her arms to give him to a stranger on a bus, which was one of the last buses leaving Sarajevo to take children out so they could be safe. And she remembers struggling with her mother to the front, crowds and crowds of people "Take my child! Take my child!" and passing her son to someone through a window. And she didn't see him for years. The siege went on for three and a half years, and it was a siege without water, without power, without electricity, without heat, without food.” - Janine di Giovanni. I couldn’t believe that something like this can happen, and innocent people will have to go through something as horrific as this. She began to explain the “gathering” for the people who were killed during this siege. There were red chairs for the people who were killed , and little chairs for the little kids who were also killed. A story like this can really affect someone if they have a heart , because families were being ripped apart and killed. I just couldn’t imagine if something like this was to happen to my family. I would be devastated. It makes me appreciate life and what I have because like this can happen to anyone. Janine di Giovanni told this story to get people to realize that war is happening all around us. Some people don’t take it serious because they don’t think that such things can happen where they live. But just like the siege that happened in Bosnia , it can happen anywhere unexpectedly.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. ""Take my child! Take my child!" and passing her son to someone through a window. And she didn't see him for years." This part stood out to me when i thought about it from her perspective.

      Delete
    2. I couldnt imagine having to choose between giving my child up to a complete stranger or to potetialy have them go throught hell and keep them with me. So many bad things could happen from being killed, to my child watching me suffer, or numerous other things that children shouldnt be exposed to. Nobody should have to make those types of decisions .

      Delete
    3. I feel that how you opened your writting out with "life is full of suprises" was great. This made me want to read what you wrote. I like how you made the statement that the story itself could have a major affect on indivduals and their lifes. This was nicely written and well thought out.

      -Javaris

      Delete
  47. Shaquan Leach

    Im not totally shore of what the point im suppose to talk about but i fill that it is about she is tring to tell about how war is wrong.
    How she talks about her friend when she as just of to work one day and she seen how war was startering to destory her whole
    life and there was nothing she could do to stop it. How she talked of how women were just giving there children and babys to
    random poeple on a bus hoping that there children will make it out safe. And that is the horrible truth when ever a war comes into
    place you should that family will be torin apart and that is a fact.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Well Shaquan, I believe you should take the time to re write this. First off, you didnt even use the correct words or grammar. I feel like if you did not understand the assignment that you should have asked for help. I think you may have made some good points if you had tried. I am not sure what you wanted to say, but maybe if you had understood what she was talking about then maybe your response would make sense.

      Delete
    2. I am "shore" Shaquan meant well in his explanation, however, Chantel is completely right on the matter of grammar. I mean, water you doing? Can't you sea the difference between shore and sure? There is definitely something fishy about this, mind you, I don't mean to come off as crabby. It is high tide you start learning about proper english grammar. I don't mean to sound like a grammar shark.

      -Sandy

      Delete
    3. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    4. Sandy,
      You're sounding very shelfish with your comment. Always fishing for jokes and insults without showing any compassion for Shaquan's insightful comment. Im atrout FINished with this Matt. Ive haddok nough! You're just lucky i dont punch you in your mussels! Now go flounder in the corner all night and smoke your seaweed.

      Joe Sardino

      Delete
    5. To be completely honest Joe, I think you have hit rock bottom with those Puns. I am trying to decide wether I shell even listen to another word of this. To be honest, you are making a bass of yourself. This is reel life Joe, you can't just hook people with sad puns like some kind of clown fish. You are going to need a nurse shark to tend to your burns after this comment.

      Delete
    6. I believe that when you are assigned a writing assignment, you should take the time to think about it and respond in an intelligent manner. Grammar should also be an important factor in a writing assignment. I believe that if you took the time to actually do the assignment and really think about what was being said; maybe you would have done a pretty decent job. There were several misspelled words which was shocking. I couldn’t understand what you were trying to say in your response; you even said that in your response, "I’m not totally shore of what the point I’m supposed to talk about”. I just think if you gave the time to thoroughly view the video or read the transcript then you would have done a decent job.

      Delete
  48. I’ve only heard stories, and reports of how survivors during the war have been affected, but never heard of stories of how people felt, and the emotion they experience when on a normal day war start out of the blue. The speaker illustrates the start of war in this brief illustration, “One day you're living your ordinary life… The next thing, the telephones go out, the TVs go out, there’s an armed man on the street, there's roadblocks…. It stops.” This Illustration it made me ponder what if I was in this situation and made me reflex on pervious wars and how people felt and what they were going through . Imagining myself in this situation I made me feel trap like there is no way out but to stay alive and try to survive off of what I could find. To help further her illustration she mentions the inconvenience that war brings on people who survived the start of it. “The siege went on for three and a half years, and it was a siege without water, without power, without electricity, without heat, without food…” Just think no power for entertainment/electronics, no food to fill your belly and especially in cold regions no heat to keep you warm. The dreadful experience

    ReplyDelete
  49. Amanda Saunders


    Janine di Giovanni held her audiences heart strings as she went into depth about the wars she reported and the victims she witnessed. She stated from her speech; "Who cares about Syria? Who cares about Bosnia? Who cares about the Congo, the Ivory Coast, Liberia, Sierra Leone, all of these strings of places that I will remember for the rest of my life? But my métier is to bear witness and that is the crux, the heart of the matter” She used sympathy to captivate the audience, while she alliterated her journey through these hardships and chaos.
    Janine di Giovanni’s speech was more informative then having an action allotted climax. In one perspective it could be seen as repetitive going on and on about the worlds gloomy predicaments. But she did not leave out any imagery to the horrors of the Rwanda Genocide or the glimpses of positive change as Hutu and Tutsi’s were no longer allowed as definition to ethnicity. She strikes me as a woman who welds a sword of words and emotional appeal, using this persuasive technique; pathos she is presenting a form of propaganda. She uses communication to influence the attitude of the media, to affect the common people and the people of higher power. To be heard in this day and age requires a key to the public’s heart, and a witty tongue politics.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Amanda I agree with your statement “Janine di Giovanni held her audiences heart strings as she went into depth about the wars.” Her passionate was quite evident just by her word choice in her statements, such as “who cares” and “giving a voice to the voiceless.” When she says, “who cares” it triggers something in my soul to say I care. Her passion makes me want to go back in time and help those innocent people slaughtered in Rwanda. It has always been a dream of mine to retire and move to Ethiopia but on my journey there I will be sure to visit the survivors in Rwanda.

      ~Sidnee McDonald

      Delete
    2. I agree with her statement. Janine did catch and grasp the audience attenion and emotions as she explain how war have affected her and her friend who was walking home from work. With her attention to detail and excellent word choices she triggered the audiences emotions and thoughts. Expecially when she said "who cares about...?" The audience may never cared about what was happening in those parts of the word before but now they are all open ears and emtions for them.

      Delete
  50. Malikk's doing!

    Javaris writes:

    James Henson talks about global warming and the planet heating up. Throughout the listening and the reading he also talks about the planet heating up and how the problem may be similar to an asteroid (a small rocky body orbiting the sun ranging in size from nearly 600 miles across to dust particles) on a collision course with the earth. Global warming is the rise in the average temperature of Earth's atmosphere and oceans since the late 19th century and its projected continuation. He goes on to say that he cares for the lifes his grandchldren and that is why he is speaking out. Children may be especially vulnerable to the effects of global warming. This can cause children to have a heat stroke damage their lung function or become dehydrated leading to injury or death. As far as an asteroid hitting the earth, the impacts can go along way in diverting danger. This can cause massive destruction not only to property and land but as well as the lives of many human beings. There could also be destruction from the asteroid through earth shocks and firestorms. This is why Henson is speaking up for his grandchldren and. This can apply to many other children any other place so they can be safe.

    ReplyDelete
  51. I found the speech by Janine di Giovanni rather melancholy and it put a damper on my entire day. No one wants to hear about 12,000 chairs representing dead bodies or how the people of Sarajevo had to survive three years of a siege with no water or electricity. Although this video is not supposed to be depressing it is supposed to raise awareness, her tone made it almost gloomier because she had a monotone voice the entire time. She has a very difficult job because not many can up and leave their safe home in order to travel to places of death and despair. Many will just listen to this speech and not understand the true reason of reporting these wars. The reason she does it is not to depress people, but to raise awareness of the current horrors going on in our world. If no one reported wars we as Americans would be clueless to them because we’ve never experienced war on our territory in our life span. Though we do not want to believe the horrors of war, they are real and I find it courageous that she had the guts to report on many wars and share the stories of real life events.

    -Maeve Cibulka

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I agree with Maeve, Janine isnt trying to make us feel all crappy and depressed about the events she witnessed, but rather aware of whats going on around us. It is true, if she or other journalists didnt report these horrific events the rest of the world wouldnt make an effort to send help. We might not realize it but other countries even today barely get news coverage, there is protests that go on in places like Yemen but since there isnt much coverage or reporting the people are unheard and voiceless.

      Delete
  52. Ms. Janine di Giovanni talks about very sad events but also about the good that comes from it she puts a spin on grief. She talks about how people helping others even if it harms oneself, she talks about life experiences that scars one, that’s kept in their memory bank for the rest of their life, that can’t be eased haunting them. The wars and depressing events that were name were life experiences like Rwanda they are not separated anymore and its peaceful now women are even in parliaments now.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Janine do talks about sad events and try to put a positive spin on things but some times you have to ask your self "why would you put your self in to dangerous situations like that". I have to agree with Mikea that wars are depressing and filled with bad memoiries your cant forget. But Janine put her self in the rawanda situation. She let her self get depress off that because she really didnt have no ties to it but emotional ones.

      Delete
  53. Shaquanleach Says I felt that you really under stead what was going on in her speech. Also I felt that the text role evidence that you use was right on point with what you were trying to get across. But I do fill that you could have given a little bit more than what you did. You can expand you thoughts and your ideas just a bit more in writing and that will take you to a whole new level in your writing. But it was a great response and you should be definitely proud of the work you done.

    ReplyDelete
  54. Jonathan “Get Money “ Feliciano
    Janine di Giovanni really touched my heart with her very emotional speech. Not everyone witnesses war and tragedies like this every day and to be quite honest some people don’t care, so long as their alright. One of my favorite quotes throughout the whole speech was when she said “My role is to bring a voice to people who are voiceless”. This is so true because a lot of countries outside of U.S are censored and limited to the information they can give out. Media does it’s best to spread news but it always causes an uproar of violence. There are people who don’t even know things like this are happening today. Thousands, even millions of people being slaughtered and no one is standing up and doing a thing. That is the role of Janine though, she is trying to spread the message and let it be known.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I feel the same way, she plays a very important role in the events she reports. We might not understand it, but Janine saves lives. She might not be able to help all the people dying around her but in the long run shes helping tons of people because she shed lights on these dark moments. She speaks for the voiceless as she said in the Ted speech "My role is to bring a voice to people who are voiceless."

      Delete
  55. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  56. Terrill Howard
    My response to Chantel Morgan

    I have to agree with Kierra but disagree with Chantel; the war doesn’t instantly grab the audience’s attention. However, after reading chantel’s reflection I felt slightly insensitive that I wasn’t able to connect or wasn’t as enlightened after reading/listening to Janine di Giovanni’s video. After reading Chantel’s reflection it caused me to think deeper and not so superficial. I think Chantel is right after all that Jeannie di Giovanni stories are gloomy but are inspiring at the same time. Chantel’s textual evidence really supported her opinion and persuaded me wholeheartedly.

    My response to Malikk

    Occidis te ipsum-Malikk

    I find it very interesting, that out of everything that I wrote that the only thing that you could possibly point out and negate was one minor typo, really? However, I’ll let your sarcasm slide because I know that’s the only way you can receive validation. Given the amount of time that we were granted for yesterday’s assignment, I think a typo or a few typos are inevitable and therefore I am not ashamed. But, that’s just my HUMBLE opinion, thanks though. I am so grateful that you took the time out to locate a typo…you will make a great publisher one day.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks Terrille! From 6th period until midnight to write 200 words certainly is very little time. I don't know what Ms. Parker was thinking! Uh-oh! There's more of that pesky sarcasm. But its okay. Because you know that I desperately seek the approval of my peers! Your base psychoanalysis and thinly veiled counter-attack were just the permissive sentences I needed to begin my journey towards self realization!

      Delete
    2. Putting "humble" in all caps is a bit ironic, don't you think?

      Delete
  57. From Aaron Scott

    Response to Sidnee McDonald

    I agree. To add on to what your saying having no electricity I couldn’t even imagine living without TV, internet, or even talk to other relatives on the phone to see how they are doing, even in cold regions imagine living with out heat to keep warm, and having to suffer the cold bitter air. All the conveniences are brought to a halt and the only thing left on the mind is what will happen to me, or how will I survive.

    Response to Meghan Rebholz

    I agree. I’ve only heard stories, and reports of how survivors during the war have been affected, but she brings out the emotion and the feeling of ones observing the start of war, and what their thinking and feeling. She did a fine good in getting the unheard stories out there so that others hearing it shall know exactly what the innocent victims in the war go through.

    ReplyDelete
  58. From Cori
    Shaquan,
    I personally think that you did not really pay much attention to the subject at hand. I feel as though you rushed through this assignment and did not take the appropriate time out to correctly do this response. All you did was state certain things that the reporter said, you didn’t give your true opinion on what was said. A lot of your words were grammatically incorrect, I find that surprising seeing as though you’re a senior in high school. I could understand if you used big words that might have been hard to spell but u misspelled trying and sure….I do give you effort for trying to the assignment though...good job !

    ReplyDelete
  59. Ty Adams

    In response to Shaquan’s blog post

    In response to Shaquan’s reply to Maeve’s blog post, I felt extremely bewildered and highly confused while reading it. It’s very alarming how many times you used the word “fill” instead of the word “feel”. Another correction is the fact that the word is “understood” not “under stead”. I feel as though you give positive and uplifting insight, but it can’t be taken seriously if your grammar doesn’t agree with the constructive criticism. An analogy for this would be like an elementary school student trying to tell a college professor how to teach; it just doesn’t make sense.

    In response to Jonathan’s blog post

    I agree with Jonathan on some of the points that he had made, however I take a different stand when it comes to the reason why we don’t know things are going on in other countries. I agree that part of the reason is because of communism, and strict government with the release of news to international media, but another part of me thinks that people in our country don’t care enough to know what tragic events take place in other countries. If people really want to know something, you better believe they’ll do their best to find out, and as Americans we have been very consumed in our routine daily lives, and sometimes fail to remember how bad other countries may have. All in all I agree with what Jonathan has to say in the fact that a lot of time we don’t know what’s going on in other countries.

    ReplyDelete
  60. From Dorothy
    Shaquan, I feel you didn’t try to understand what Janine di Giovanni was talking about. What you wrote didn’t make any sense. I do give you credit for doing the assignment because I didn’t, but I feel you could’ve put more heart and effort into it and explain what her purpose was. You didn’t use any textual evidence to support any of things you said. I liked how you talked about how mothers give their kids away to strangers hoping they would their kids safe. Overall this response to the reporter was not that well written there was a lot of misuse of words.

    ReplyDelete
  61. Amanda Saunders

    Responding to Maeve Cibulka
    It’s refreshing to see the different point of views, and rebellion. Maeve relinquishes her views on Janine di Giovanni, stating “I found the speech by Janine di Giovanni rather melancholy and it put a damper on my entire day” But at the same time, death surrounds us every day; whether it is by nature or action, one cannot let the past affect their future. Everyone digests information differently. I had already studied Rwanda’s genocide, horrific as it is, but at the same time fascinated someone could have a mindset so revolting and ghastly.
    Responding to Eysa Mohamed aka Habibi aka young GoodMan
    Through skimming all the opinions of Janine di Giovanni’s Eysa’s stuck out to me. He is not bashing nor agreeing with her speech but at the same time pulling a 180. I did not even notice the fact she only mentioned children and mothers. I would concur that she could be seen as sexist. Thousands and thousands of men died and helped to save Mothers, children and other men suffering through Rwanda’s genocide, but they are not mentioned. In my opinion Janine di Giovanni was in a way “milking the sympathy card” You cannot keep speaking the same tongue and pulling the same heart strings if you want to make to make a substantial difference.

    ReplyDelete
  62. Donyel Jackson
    In response to Eysa Mohamed

    When you said that she could have talked about the men of the war i think that she had only wrote about what she experienced personally. She was trying to bring awareness about wars through the things that she's seen and that is the most effective way of telling things. Of course most of the male population were casualties but a lot of them were most likely soldiers fighting the war so they weren't seen as innocent civilians, it was something they were involved in.Usually women and children are the civilian population and are the ones that society feels the need to protect. I agree with what you're saying though, it isn't necessarily sexist. There have probably been many speakers talking about this situation so there is a chance that the male population has been mentioned a lot of times.

    ReplyDelete
  63. Donyel Jackson

    In response to Shaquan

    It would have actually been great to read about his views on this a little more clear. It seems like he understood the point but failed to be grammatically correct. It's not that his ideas were wrong but rather the content being scattered a little. It would have been nice to actually see his views on this issue taken a little more seriously. Perhaps maybe next time.

    ReplyDelete
  64. Reply to Chantel Morgan
    I agree that "Though most cannot comprehend the dreadful experiences, many can feel the emotion that she expresses when she speaks." She was able to convey emotions to that audience using descriptions that gave a clear visual image, such as the pile of people that were twice the height of her. Although the words will never come close to the real experience of being in war. It allows the audience to have something that they can grab on to, allowing them to have a better understanding, even if it's only a little bit.

    Reply to Jessica Vongxay
    I agree that it isn't just the wars that occur between countries have significance. Crimes that occur daily may not be as devastating as wars because the scale is a lot smaller, but that doesn't degrade the each destruction's value.

    - Junwan Ge

    ReplyDelete
  65. Leon Lin

    Responds to Becky:
    I agree with the things you stated, Janine indeed is courageous and she shows that she is very strong woman because she is very independent. I was also quite shock when she explains about the little chairs that stretch for a large portion of the city. For me, her descriptions created imageries of what it could have looked like. The repulsiveness of such large number is quite disturbing. “I now cover Syria, and I started reporting it because I believed that it needs to be done. I believe that a story there has to be told.” This statement too has stuck me, she believes that everyone should know what’s going on in society, and we as humans should all pitch in to help.


    Responds to Shamira:
    I agree with Shamira, a woman having a discussion about war gives a whole different approach. Not often do we see the reality that’s happening around us but she did a great job interpreting the situation. The way she gave her description was different from other journalists; she was able to connect with individuals because she gave a motherly approach. She spoke about how her life seemed to be in darkness until she had her child; this interested me because she was still able to find hope after witnessing such horrifying images. I also found the statement, “miniskirt and high heels,” and “young mother,” to be a significant because people don’t often think that war or chaos will happen. People usually think that modernized countries wouldn’t fall under to war but they are often wrong, and when war does descend people are too late to counteract.

    ReplyDelete
  66. From Gabby to Ryder
    In response to Ryder's post, I think he made some very important points. It may be harder to grasp what Giovanni is saying in a classroom full of noise. It's easy to lose focus and have your thoughts trail off, making you feel as if her speech is less interesting than it is intended to be. A person might also get two different perspectives reading it and listening to it. I read the speech before listening to it, which is probably why I felt differently about her tone than some of my peers. It just goes to show that the way a person distributes their information can have a big impact on the way it is perceived. =

    ReplyDelete
  67. Meghan responding to Jessica
    At the beginning of the speech, like Jessica stated, I thought that her intentions were to encourage people to try and stop war. Towards the end of her speech, Janine di Giovanni expressed that her goal was to spread awareness and share her experiences of war. I agree with how Jessica stated that Americans should be very grateful and appreciate that we don’t have a war going on in our own country. We are very lucky not to have another country fighting with us on our own land, but we still do have high crime rate all over America. Even though we aren’t fighting against another country, we are fighting against ourselves. Either way, death of many innocent people is involved.


    Meghan responding to Tara
    I agree with Tara on how I will never be able to understand how reporters voluntarily go into war to write about their experiences. It is a terrifying thing to me and they have a great amount of bravery and courage. The stories Janine di Giovanni spoke about seemed so unreal to me also. Especially because I have never had to go through any awful experiences similar to these ones. Tara says “I wasn't fully emotionally connected because I have no idea how it feels to see a tank coming down the street or to have to leave my child because i’m being forced to go to a different country to report about a war.” I agree with this statement because since I have no idea how horrible experiences like these feel like, I couldn’t relate to the stories at all. However, I still was deeply moved.

    ReplyDelete
  68. Ja'Nai Gray
    To:Keith Gamble


    I agree with your response. I like how you pulled out evidence that was very clear and important that alot of people skipped over. However I feel like the speaker could have shown more emotion; because the speech seemed as though it was rehersed. I often questioned myself and asked ,why do she have that index card? She also lacked facial expression her; face seemed like she didn't connect with the topic she was speaking about.Ms.Janine di Giovanni's stage presence was very stiff,she stayed in one place. At certain points of the video I felt like she researdced the situation and convinceed the audience that she was present at the occurence.





    Ja'Nai Gray
    To: Hannah K

    I totally agree with your response. I never really understood about war and why citizens get involved;it really bothers me to hear of people especially other countries and states getting involved in wars that didnt even have anything to do with them. Its very mind boggling and I hate to hear of casualties. I give props to all who have served in any military like stuff. I find it very weird that Janine di Giovanni was able to compose her feelings throughout the video, not showing any emotion until six minutes and about forty seconds and then at eleven minutes fourteen seconds. At times it seemed like she was telling a story that she witnessed from a secondary person point of view.

    ReplyDelete
  69. To Briana from Dorothy
    Briana, your response to the reporter was beautiful; you hit all the important things that Janine di Giovanni spoke about. I also liked how you quoted when she said “everything, not just about being a reporter, but also about being a human being.” You really brought what she said to light and helped me better understand what her purpose was going overseas to report war.

    ReplyDelete